Noodles34

me too, however i find our fans pretty similar to all fans, good and bad, certainly would not say our fans are any worse, in fact our away support is pretty good compared to others, but obviously your 'coolness' standards are set higher than your average fan

you cant say 'underperformed' on here.

based on this forum

Than ususal? How's that?

of course, he deserved it. But think it's gone on long enough now. Most of them have gone on to bigger clubs, despite what was said earlier in the season! Anyway, it just comes across all bitter now.

Waight this thread is embarrassing as is this post. Move on people and stop going on about people who are not here anymore. I mean bigging up a Chelsea win because they beat MP. Really?

So, if we didn't win another game for the rest of the season, you would still say it's been a great season? Can't agree with that, we have to see this Eason out on consistent form to make a great season, in fact if we were to miss out on Europe or finish 9th, then surely it would be a terrible season.

Thats crazy money, guess Clynee would be on the same. It's not really a fair game anymore.

Ok, strange when people disagree with what you are saying and then get all abusive (from their keyboard) and its like, why would you be like that?

Haven't we already done this one?

Shaw is on that? I find that really hard to believe for his first contract.

You starting to act a bit obsessed mate, and it's kinds of weird. You can disagree with me all you like, but can you stop stalking me please.

isn't that where he is now?

Yes, maybe I will but were we not paying GR an DO 60K per week? And how much is Toby on? So how much are Utd going to pay Clyne, more than 80K? Doubt it.

Probably not to be fair, but I thought it was about transfers in, not necessarily wages. I might be wrong but if I am not then spending might be an issue, but if we have good players then it's a case of keeping them, does that break FFP?

So that comment goes for Chelsea and City does it? The difference here is that we do have the money, unlike the nonces down the road, who had nowhere near enough to sustain their payroll.

So we pay them £5m, then we are competing.

Well that was sort of my point, clearly these footballers sign up for the money, so if we offer the same wages and keep the best players and then win stuff and then go into the champions league we become a big club. We aren't a million miles away at the moment are we, so is not the optimum time to take the next step forward?

...

but we are backed by a person that owns more than than the shareholders of Man Utd, Liverpool, Spurs (maybe), she could compete if she wanted to, Chelsea and City have shown that's possible over the last decade or so. We cant compete with their history or even their fanbase so some extent, but its actually not that hard to pay Clyne 80K a week if she wanted to. That would spell real ambition, but if we are not ambitious then fine, its not an issue, its just, what are we?

Surely with all that ambition we have, the players won't want to be going anywhere?

Potentially world class according to some

And no match recognition, not one of Cortese's greatest days. But we get one for Gary Speed who has no connection and decided to die himself.

yes, we will have to disagree on that, hope you are right in the long run!

couldn't help yourself could you?