Gemmel

And the old girl shines again :) :) Saints win at Anfield away and the skates lose at home to Fleetwood. Carlsberg written all over it

Agreed...... but the one against west brom was

See above

Change that to Morgan Scheiderlin and you have a proper football song

Any mods want to help out with my title spelling would be much appreciated :) :)

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/10689283.Rodgers_previews_Saints_clash/?ref=twt&utm_content=Southampton,+Saints, Are you worried about the Ariel threat of Rickie Lambert. Brendan Rogers puts him right. I don't buy into the "Anti Saints" media, but refreshing to see Brendan Rodgers putting some ******* half wit back in his box. My lad is at uni doing a Sports Journalist degree...... Questions like that, convince me he will be fine.

Buttner. The irony is that Shaw only got his chance because our deal for Buttner fell through as he went to Utd. Money and player..... works for me

Foot in mouth comment? I think you have the monopoly on those. Just to humour you , the point was that despite all of this prejudice and persecution, he has been able to build a successful company over ten years.

25 million and Buttner.... Deal

God bless you Rallyboy........... To bed with a chuckle

Shut it Turks. Toon Saint will come along and rescue the Jews. They don't know they need rescuing , they don't want to be rescued, but rescued they will be. Not sure what my Jewish boss will make of it having seen his company value break two and a half billion, but I am sure he will appreciate it.

See what you nutjobs have done? Hope you are happy with yourselves http://fansonline.net/portsmouth/mb/view.php?id=513714

BBC Solent Sport‏@solentsport1m #Pompey set to bring striker John Marquis on loan from Millwall with Ryan Bird set to be loaned out to Havant and Waterlooville

Out yourself on the gay thread - You will get more attention

But didnt neil allen tell us the table was from the victory? This is an intresting one- I assume this is the builder that was ripped off by previous administrtions, but that's not the point....... If the club claim them, is that an acknowlegdement of association? Or do will they distance themselves from the previous regiemes and not stake a claim......answers on a postcard.

yes please - please see pm

Prime Minister says is fine; http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/tottenham-fans-should-not-be-prosecuted-for-yid-chants-david-cameron-wades-into-antisemitism-row-8821574.html

But this Burkha is not a religious symbol.

There's a whole new thread in the that sentence! I'm not sure I would put it top of the tree, but certainly right up there. The pre match "Walk On" gets the old hairs sticking up. I have a gut feeling, that there is going to be a lot more people that will be able to post on this thread after Saturday.

LMFAO. You were the one that made something up - Can we agree on that, goodness know how many times you have gone back and re read it, to try and understand how you got it so wrong and how you twisted it to fuel your outrage. Read it again - it says "May be " and "I" (As in me) don't know. We are all made differently and have different make ups, that doesn't mean deficiencies, as you lied about to try and curry favour for your argument. So why on earth would I intervene to support you......especially when you are so wrong. It's strange, I do all home matches and about 75% of away matches and (Think) I could rattle off any song that comes from a Saints fans terrace....... With the exception of anti gay, homophobic songs, of which I don't know a single one - Don't you find that strange for such a massive problem.

Probably best to call it a day toon Saint. You have made stuff up and in your quest for outrage, read something into as post that wasn't there, to fuel your argument, when all it did was the opposite. Now you are making judgments on what comedy can be considered good, only to confirm it is personal opinion. Get yourself up to Westminster and see what they are protesting about this week - I am sure you will find a good cause to tie your colours to. The rest of us will just enjoy the football and banter.

That's great - Except the burkha isn't a religious symbol

And there you have it. Through your own blind narrow minded mind, in your quest for feigned outrage, you have completely / deliberately read something into my post that quite simply didn't exist. Which considering the debate, could be seen as rather ironic, given most of the posters are arguing against you that there is no problem, whilst you are on your little crusade assure us there is, you appear to have proven the point in case. And just to humour you, I never mentioned "deficiencies" what I said was the genetic make up (Could equally have been genetic attributes - But you rushed in all offended). A simple google search validates the thought (Yeah the one that you said was completely wrong and not worthy of any consideration) that there are genetic differences in the make up of straight / gay men and women. The example already cited on here is black swimmers. We all know what great sports achievements black people have made and will continue to do so, but something in the genetics doesn't lend itself very well to Olympic swimming. It is also unlikely that Peter Crouch will Spawn a national hunt winning jockey. Given the apparent disproportionate % of straight footballers/ sports people in general, when compared to the gay / straight splits reported in the general public, it would be foolish not to consider that genetics may play some part and these very same genetics, may well be considered positive or attributes......But hey ho, make some more stuff up and get hot under the collar about it. You have done yourself no favours. Feel free to apologise for making false accusations.

Should probably lock this thread now - Move the topic over to the lounge if you want to discuss it further.

You are looking for ways to be outraged, by Orchards point of view, but you are failing to consider the simple fact that maybe the genetics of a professional footballer and indeed many other sports may not lend themselves to the genetics of a homosexual man. I have no idea if that is true or not, but it seems to make sense or worthy of some thought to me.