Saint_clark

That's what I mean - even if he does well, the second he does anything wrong people will be on his back again and he'll throw in the towel.

I guarantee you all it would take was one game of mis-hit crosses, skied shots and running himself into a corner before we go through this whole cycle again. Get rid of him, get someone else in.

Looks like Paul Allen is looking to take over The Terras now - his yacht is in Weymouth bay at the moment.

I actually disagree.

I'd be tempted to start Sinclair up front.

And that is not the message at all. The message, as it has always been, is that if you do not take notice of warnings (infractions) and continue to break the rules then you will be banned.

That's all well and good, but your previous statement suggests that if we don't win then we won't go up - which is ridiculous.

I may have explained myself poorly, but I still feel you've missed the point of what I was saying. We know that all forms of racism are unacceptable - I said so myself, but you simply dismissed it. As for us turning a blind eye or you wasting your time - all posts that were reported have been dealt with. If we've missed one or two in a 6 page thread then I apologise, but we cannot check every post on every thread on every board.

How do you know how hard we are trying? I think Macheda is overrated personally, and Townsend is a good midtable player - but he's not the "big push" type player we need.

Nor did your examples have much relevance. Did it not occur to you we may be looking for higher quality players than Blackpool or Doncaster?

Bristol beat us at home, here's hoping Coventry can pull off a similar result.

As far as I see it, the immediate bans for racism is for the more obscene offences, racial hatred, condoning racial violence etc. Whilst your analogies are fair points, this place is more often compared to a pub and the banter that goes along with it. If you used one of the words that were used in the Tadanari Lee thread in a pub you would most likely get shouted down and told to shut up, and then after repeat offences be told to leave - which is exactly what the infractions system does. Without naming names I can tell you that at least one poster is on their last chance, and one more infraction will automatically result in a ban. Finally I can guarantee you that none of the mods or admin in any way condone or agree with racism at any level, nor are we protecting certain posters as you seem to think.

The racist posts have been deleted now - but I haven't the faintest idea what pornographic images you're referring to.

Looks like he'd suit us perfectly from what I've seen - hitting shots first time in the area, a real poacher. Obviously it's only Youtube, but our scouts would have seen much more of him. It's still only a rumour of course...

It was clear that he is low on confidence when in the first half V Bristol City he had a great chance to shoot from the edge of the box, but instead held it up and passed it wide.

He had a great start to the season, which people seem to have forgotten.

Gonna nip this in the bud. My condolences, Huffton.

Allardyce confirmed that Huddersfield had given them a firm no and that West Ham couldn't afford what they were asking. Not sure why this would wind anyone up - it means that Rhodes will not be going there.

As has been mentioned before, they could get rid of some of the ridiculously overpaid presenters/pundits (and i'm not just talking about on MOTD here) and then they could afford the footy contracts.

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~2560081,00.html

Here's hoping Sky take up the contract.

Mate, it's not like the rest of us were hoping for anything else.

How are people enjoying the democratic decision to get rid of the HCDAJFU threads back in the summer?

...and now thanks to this, anybody we do sign will be seen as not good enough, and the january transfer window will be deemed a "failure to capitalise".

I love looking back at threads like that where people come out with utter tosh.