Gingeletiss

Looks a bit waterlogged down in the far right hand corner, IMO.

You're 'aving a larf, more like finding one who played well. These were supposed to be the cream of England, I could of kitted up eleven fans out there, who would of given a more commited performance.

Interesting little site http://www.oi-fa.com/index.aspx Puts average gate information into perspective, we had a higher gate than Poopey...FACT!.

Should you be feeling suicidal, over that inept display by Our national team, please feel free to call our helpline on 414141.

Methinks the lights are starting to be turned on around Portsea Island! betalucky User is offline The first team squad on the OS shows us with 19 senior players, one of whom is long-term injured, and at least two of whom we cannot re-sign even if the players choose to do so, so that leaves 16 and no goalkeepers. Add Nugent makes 17. In order to fund the CVA, we are told we need to raise £15 Million in transfer fees. I don't believe we can do it, but the closest we can get would require selling at least Nugent, Boateng, Belhadj, Utaka, Mokoena, Mullins and Diop. So that leaves 11. Plus we desperately want ben Haim of our books, that would be 10. We cannot sign anyone, we are told, until at least July 15. But the FL will need some proof of funding and presumably some kind of meeting after that date, so let's be optimistic and say we might achieve it in a week. So let's say Friday July 23. We are touring America from July 12 to 24, OK let's say we can play those games with unregistered players from the academy, but that means Cotterill getting back on Sunday 25 with two weeks to the opening League game. So we are looking pretty screwed just from that, but if there is any other delay, such as an HMRC appeal or the FL saying that we need to have some certainty of our ownership, then we will quite clearly be unable to complete our first fixtures which begin on August 7. I am not talking about us fielding a weak team, that seems inevitable in the early games like last season. I am talking about us not even being able to put out a bare XI, let alone any subs. The whole transfer embargo thing is bloody ridiculous. We have a tiny squad anyway. We should at least be allowed to sign players who are already with the Club, and also to bring in new players on the basis of one out, one in Of course I can well understand why the FL don't want to do that, but if they stick to their guns until the bitter end and then something goes wrong, the consequences would not bear thinking about. In principle we can still play even while we are still in administration. But not without a squad we can't. pompeydiehard User is offline Beta right,we also supposedly have a friendly against H@W in a week or so time,not sure of the date .How are we going to fulfill the fixtures . betalucky User is offline I've checked it out, we actually do need an owner. The Football League Share belongs to the owners not to the Club, and they won't give the Share to a club in administration. So what we have now is a kind of associate membership, which allows us to fulfill our fixtures and sell players but not to do much else. And that's the way it will stay until we get granted our FL Share. bwblue User is offline AA has made it perfectly clear; we must have a new owner in place IMMEDIATELY if we are going to have a chance of fielding a competitive team in 2010/11. We have now reached the most important stage of the whole process and it could still go one way or the other it seems. Definitely squeeky bum time. betalucky User is offline 'bwblue' wrote at 09:04 on 25 Jun: AA has made it perfectly clear; we must have a new owner in place IMMEDIATELY if we are going to have a chance of fielding a competitive team in 2010/11. We have now reached the most important stage of the whole process and it could still go one way or the other it seems. Definitely squeeky bum time. Yes he did, but I just thought he was being a drama queen. I thought we had the option to play a season in administration. Which we do theoretically, but with a transfer embargo in place the only way to play would be to keep the players that we really need to sell to raise money for the CVA. suicide User is offline Lloydd says his consortium have made an offer it's about time that AA came clean and gave us some detail. Feeding tit bits to an already disenchanted fan base won't wash. We need some positive news without caveats or reservations and we need it from the man controlling this clubs destiny. lovedeanblue User is online The FL are a "joke" with even goalie emergencies, ask Kevin Dillon & the legend Aldershot's goalie coach. Jamie Young their keeper was injured in the play off 1st Leg v Rotherham. Man City in the Premier had been granted after all a replacement despite having 8 or 9 fit keepers on their books of all levels. Aldershot were turned down by the FL and had to play the 2nd leg with a very young inexperienced keeper on the bench. In the end it didn't matter Aldershot went out and he stayed on the bench. My point is, it could have mattered. If we want help from the FL, don't hold our breath :/ :/ KENWRIGHT User is offline I stand corrected, according to the Snooze the minimum squad size is 20. And apparently we already have 27. How they make that out is beyond me. lovedeanblue User is online I stand corrected, according to the Snooze the minimum squad size is 20. And apparently we already have 27. How they make that out is beyond me. Including academy staff Ken is the only way I can see >

But of course they can, just keep running up the debt, hey, it's worked for the last couple of years! ps I added a bit for you;)

For Corp Hohoho, an example of how deluded your fans are! scumslayer Posted on 23/06/2010 10:48 Clever Andy, FA have to make a tough decision Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message The league hate Portsmouth Football Club and deliberately created conditions under which we could be relegated? [:I] Link: Or this ffs! Carlin20 Posted on 22/06/2010 17:33 Biggest club in championship next season Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 1.Pompey 2.Leeds 3.Derby FACT ffs, When did the rest have two fa cup finals in three years? MASSIVE Aight Big fish - small pond innit

More from the 'report'! Just a few examples from the Unsecured Creditor's Report (which interestingly includes the football creditors despite the withholding of parachute payments from the PL). 1) Paul Hart submitted a claim for £450,000 in settlement of his contract up to 30 June 2010. Receiving twenty pence in the pound, the CVA will afford him a salary of £18,000p/a for five years. This news comes a day after the final five redundancies were made at the club. 2) Sol Campbell has submitted a claim of £1,670,000 for image rights, unpaid bonuses and unpaid salary. He will receive a salary of £66,800p/a for five years funded by the CVA. Storrie reportedly offered the image rights clause to Sol in order to attain him without paying a signing on fee. His fee would have been less than half of the remaining figure of his claim. 3) Stade Rennais submitted a claim of £4,150,531, assumably for unpaid fees for John Utaka. They will receive £166,021 for five years, funded by the CVA. This figure is ~10% of the weekly wage budget for the playing squad in next year's Championship. 4) The PFA have submitted a claim for unpaid fees relating to Nadir Cifti. Cifti is a Chelsea Reserve who never played for Pompey. Most fans never knew he was at the club. Cifti will cost the CVA £2,264.60p/a for five years. 5) A claim for £3,528,583 has been submitted for unpaid salary, bonues and image rights for Hayden Mullins. This will cost the CVA £141,143p/a for five years. Hayden Mullins is currently being touted in the press as a £1M signing for Championship and League 1 teams. Peter Storrie will have you know that all of this was available to you for the princely sum of £600,000p/a basic, "which for 20 years in football is very reasonable".

Another bid, apparently:lol: Fratton4life User is online #1 23 Jun 2010 17:48 Complain | Prev | Next | Quote and reply to userReply to user Signed: February 2010 Looks like we could have new owner soon ... Posts: 189 Academy Academy Apparently AA is in Hong Kong sorting out a deal with some French-Moroccan group. Also Lloyd and his 'client' have supposedly lodged a bid. Its good AA coming out and saying, we need to be brought NOW. But i just hope they don't rush into a new ownership nd not knowing their true extent of funds! From here I take it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jun/23/portsmouth-meeting-potential-buyers

Not convinced, not at all!

Who say's he has, some on here are only speculating!

Talking about the England game in the last hour, begs me to raise this question. If Saints were playing a playoff game live on Sky, at the same time as this England match, who would you watch. For me it would be Saints every time!.......and you would watch???

Lol...that's why she granted several conditions, which I might add, are the ones that will finally sink HMS Poopey. The S of A, that Vantis produced, told a different story to the one you are claiming, they said you were insolvent!, but hey, don't let the facts spoil your own version of how flush you were when you were taken to court!

You, the Poopey poster who has not posted one trueful thing, the poser who comes on here, claiming 'insider' information, but in reality, talks a load of crap. Every time you are challanged, you disappear, until the Hooha has died down, then like a bad smell, you re-appear spouting the same drivel.....

Oh but we are, by a country mile, but you and your fellow bottom dwellers, fail to see that. How am I not surprised! Been in admin before have we? learnt how to do it bigger and better this time? Don't come on here claiming the moral highground, ffs, we can't even post on your poxy comments section in that crappy local rag you have:x, let alone go on your forums without vile abuse being levied at us!.

Did you miss the underlying point of his comments. He was having a dig at his manager, yes, the one that took away his captaincy, and as a result, was underminning his authority in front of the world press. For that alone, as far as I'm concerned, he should have been sent home. It matters not that he was saying what we have all said, he was bang out of order. I suspect this 'we're bored' statement, was a pop at Capello for banning the WAGs.

Or landmines!

SRS, I can't for the life of me, understand why you defend the indefensible. You were the same about the saints players who nicked from the handbags in Southsea, then you laughed and said it was only high spirits .If we all lived by your rules, there would be war on the streets!

Are you referring to the Administrator at Poopey?

I disagree, I don't think he has lost the dressing room, I do agree about that aseh0le Terry, but by all accounts, he has been told to shut up by the rest of the team. As to the state of football, it is indeed in a sorry state, this is due to players being paid far more than their managers, thus thinking they are in control. If what happend to the French team, happened to us, I'd say, bring the lot home in disgrace, and foreit the next match.

Where did you get this from? The News posted this story, but said this will only happen if there is no objection to the CVA, so.........................

So now it's a King! Pompey1998 Posted on 19/06/2010 16:11 Moroccan king to takeover? Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message Anyone else heard these rumours flying about? IP: Logged my_pfc_dream Posted on 19/06/2010 16:16 Moroccan king to takeover? Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message WTF!!! we were talking about who it could be on POL and I looked for a morrocan businessman with french links and I just posted his wiki page to see what people think. Where did you get this rumour from or are you just exaggerating. ----- For people who have not seen it this is what we were debating: Regarding the club's potential sale, Andronikou said: "I need to push it through. I fly to France to meet a French-Moroccan individual who has serious money. Rob Lloyd is still in the picture, trying to raise funds I hear, and there is a Ukrainian party, though I'm unable to travel to South Africa, where they are watching the World Cup at the moment, to meet them.

A statement from Jamie Hart, in relation to all the crap fired at him, and in part, his father. The interesting bit is highlighted! Unfortunately it has become necessary for me to issue the following post on this message board. In recent weeks/ months there have been a number of inaccurate posts placed on this board in relation to myself as an agent and supposed players that I represent at Portsmouth fc. Before I start putting the facts forward I must make it clear that I am not opposed to any critism as long as the facts are accurate. Let me deal with issues 1 by 1. 1. I have not done any transfers in or out of Portsmouth football club. 2. I have never been paid 1 penny by Portsmouth Football club. 3. I do not represent Tal Ben Haim though it is true I did represent him some years ago I have had nothing to do with this player's career for many years now. 4. I do not represent Danny Webber as has been suggested on various posts, in fact I have never met the guy. 5. I do not represent Eugene Bopp, again it is true that I represented him along time ago whilst he was at Nottingham Forest but I have had nothing to do with his career since then. 6. There has been a suggestion that I am owed £750,000 by the club under the guise of Sports Invest. This is absolutely incorrect. I worked for Sports invest for 1 month in January 2010 and I carried out no agency activity for this company. For your information there are a number of agents who work for sports invest. Taking into account the above facts you will see why I have been disturbed by some posts insinuating that my father and I have been colluding in some way over transfers at Portsmouth FC. I also understand why Portsmouth fans are upset at the way the club has been run over recent years but I suggest that the anger (which I share) is reserved for the correct people. I will also touch briefly on the recent story released by the administrator stating that my father rejected the CVA offer. Unfortunately there are alot of facts in relation to this that I can't go into for legal reasons but in due course these facts will enter the public domain when my father sees fit and I'm sure then people will have a better understanding of what has gone on. I'm sorry I cannot elaborate more and believe me I would if I could. Believe it or not my Father and I both have a great respect for Portsmouth FC and we believe that we have both acted with the utmost integrity and will continue to do so, despite these difficult circumstances none of which have been of our making. I hope that the club can now move on and be successful in the future under more professional and prudent corporate leadership.

You my fishy fiend, seem to be counting chickens, before the eggs are hatched, methinks you may end up with some of them spread all over your scaley face:p

Again, I ask, where are Griffins votes? please Mr Administrator, enlighten me:?