trousers

This has got 4-4 written all over it!!!

Yes...penalty saints

One question: Why didn't we sign Mackail-Smith?

This. Easy near post save. FFS

This one is working a treat: http://www.everythingon.tv/channel/view/sky-sports-2-2

This has got 4-4 written all over it...

KIV we've still got to player Brighton and Bournemouth once and Charlton twice. Of course, we could lose all four of those matches, which makes my observation totally irrelevant!

But the server hasn't blown up on this one. Every cloud.... :-)

These results could just be the extra motivation the team needs to win tonight.....or......

Tranmere vs Notts County abandoned COME ON THE RAIN!!!!!

Jesus Christ. FFS

ffs I can see Brighton winning the league at this rate and us having to overall Bournemouth for 2nd

ffs I can see Bournemouth winning the league at this rate and us having to overall Brighton for 2nd

(d) Frottage

Congratulations Sam :-)

All quangos are truly independent? Hmmmm... And I'm not saying they came to their decision unindependently. I'm suggesting that the way the human mind works may have influenced their independent decision. Anyway, sincere apologies for airing an OPINION on here. Sigh.

I know the IFO are badged as an independent arbitrator but they are human and humans are easily swayed (consciously or subconsciously). Cortese (or whoever represented the club at the IFO meeting) would have known that they were under no obligation to disclose what they (rightly or wrongly) saw an internal club matter. I therefore venture that the IFO, at least in part, came to their conclusion because they were hacked off that SFC played a straight bat. To me, the most logical verdict from the IFO would gave been an open verdict but I suspect they were playing a tit-for-tat game with the club. Yes, the IFO may well turn out to have made the correct verdict but it wasn't a verdict reached purely on logic IMHO.

http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=424&fid=203&sty=2&act=1&mid=2118519019

Which month is Chamberlain on...?

No, that's tomorrow's Saints game silly ;-)

£10million?

How do we KNOW you would. You could just be saying that... ;-)

It was 'only' 10 players affected so, conceivably, it could be just the players with Lloyds accounts that were affected. That said, I'd be surprised if they used email to communicate such an error. Banks are very reluctant to use email to communicate with customers about personal issues for security reasons. I'm sure with the level of their income they would be looked after by the 'VIP department' (Wealth Management they used to call it - I worked at Lloyds for 20 years...) and any problems would have initially been dealt with by a phone call. I still know people at Lloyds so will see if anything has popped up about this on their intranet...