trousers

Those that goad him to do it are even funnier though. And, yes, I will "do groundhog again" for you if you ask nicely

Would be out of character given his posting history

Well, that's Adam on his way then. Cue forum meltdown...

The latest entries at Companies House probably back up your train of though there Gemmel.... an outstanding charge was satisfied in February....

Oh great.... After Cardiff beat us Solskaer cited a 'siege mentality' helped them win after their "issues" from the previous week galvanised them. So, knowing our luck, Aston Villa will have a similar reaction against us at the weekend. Christ, I'm starting to sound as down in the dumps as Alpine....

Adrian Durham has always been quite an astute fellow.... http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?21345-Stupid-Durham-on-talksport

I found it quite easy to argue with it but can't be arsed to write it on here (again)

9.5/10

Chomp. Chomp. Chomp

Chomp. Chomp. Chomp

Anyone on here end up going to this? I assume no 'juicy' ITK snippets came out of it otherwise we'd have heard by now....?

Got through the online queue to find that I could only buy one for me and not my son (as expected), then phoned up and they were happy for me to get 2 tickets on the 1 customer number as they could see from the booking system history that I'd always bought our tickets together on the same customer number. Good to see some discretion being used

Yep, top of my list. The only manager to get a victory at the home of the champions elect.

That's probably why it's broken....

I always buy 2 tickets on one customer number.

Indeed

So, bottom line is we'll never know for sure why he left but two possible options are: (a) wanted to be closer to home or (b) wanted to start more games for SFC ?

As highlighted on here several times, the original article inserted the amounts in brackets and thus didn't directly attribute the quote to Ramirez. Other websites subsequently removed the brackets thus making it look like a direct quote from Ramirez. That's not to say that the original journo made up the figures - they may well be right - but I think its reasonable to deduce from the original article that Ramirez didn't reveal the numbers during the interview. IMHO of course.

If there was any justice in Pompeyland ( ) any windfalls such as this should be shared out amongst previous creditors who lost out in CVA1. By using it to pay for EXISTING obligations under CVA2 simply means that their debt gets paid earlier. But of course this is Pompey so they'll look to benefit from it rather than concern themselves with Joe Public who have lost c.£150m over the last 5 years.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2602802/How-Liberal-party-police-MI5-concealed-MP-Cyril-Smiths-industrial-scale-child-abuse.html

I share my account with Bobby Davro

Just got back home. Another one of those "how on earth did we lose that?" games. The first half was all about *when* we were going to score, not *if*. So much space in midfield for us but no cutting edge. I haven't read this thread yet but I would imagine the phrase: "That's how much we miss JRod" crops up quite a bit. A few of our players seemed like they were in "don't get myself injured before the world cup" mode. Understandable I suppose given what they witnessed last week. MotM = Cork or Davis Oh well...onto Villa....