Matthew Le God

It isn't cricket for the host of an award show to give himself awards Dune.

Can you make the middle chunk more concise and summarise your point rather than a massive paragraph of ramblings?

I may have misunderstood you point but if it is as I believe, you are insane!

They are showing the World cup games on the screens in the Chapel concourses as you wait.

Very unlikely Saints could attract a player from the Bundesliga that is playing at the World Cup.

Kelvin's kicking isn't great tbf

If you are going to recreate a historic kit you shouldn't go halfway. The socks were black in 1885, so a recreation of the kit should have black socks.

Were you expecting a squad photo? Maybe they were on holiday. Maybe they didn't need 20 1st team players for a photo shoot of 5 players. Some had to be left out.

An 85% approval rating from a poll of 1077 people is very impressive! With 7% indifferent and 7% against. I doubt many kits from any team have ever had such high approval from a large sample of the fanbase. Umbro and Cortese/Liebherr (who would have given it final approval) choose very well indeed.

So what happens if they play a non Football League team (Premiership or conference) in the FA Cup or League Cup away from home and there is a clash but Saints have no away kit?

You do talk crap. That breaks Football League rules. 35.1 and 35.2

So what about MK Dons and Tranmere? What about cup games? btw I guarantee you the Brentford vs Saints game will be with Saints in an away kit due to a clash. It is a Football League rule all teams should have an away kit.

Just a few examples (there are others in League One)... Red and White Brentford Exeter Teams that have lots of white - like the Saints kit MK Dons Tranmere Are you also saying Saints won't play teams in the 3 cup competitions that the new kit won't clash with? You clearly don't understand what constitutes a kit clash.

You can't get more traditional than wearing a kit based on the first ever kit.

I don't understand why some are complaining about the black socks. The 1885 kit had black socks so if you are doing a modern version then the 2010 kit should have black socks. Either go the whole way with the concept of a historic kit or don't bother.

S****horpe are in the League above Charlton.

The Daily Echo's circulation has decreased significantly over the last 10-15 years(basically coinciding with the rise of the internet) and is continuing to fall. Local papers need clubs FAR more than clubs need local papers when they have so many other media outlets available to them compared to the 60's, 70's, 80's and early to mid 90's.

Is that a good or bad thing?

If the club didn't want the Echo to show the kit they just don't sell them the pictures. They don't need to wait until after they start going to print. If these were release 5 hours ago the paper couldn't just steal the photos from the website without Cortese's permission. You have turned it into a conspiracy theory.

Who's going to start the "Where is the away kit and goalkeepers kit" thread?

The photos it is based on has the sash both ways. This is due to it physically being separate from the white shirt. Thus some players in 1885 put it over one shoulder and some put it over the other shoulder. You'd think they would realise and be uniform.

Looks great!

Merry Christmas

At least with Wiki it has people that correct things if people make errors. With http://footballrumours.co.uk they just let it stay on the site

This website just puts lists of rumours that ANYONE in the world sends to them. It is the least reliable source for transfer information there is.