Matthew Le God

You forgot these two...

Better players and a significantly bigger budget (wages and transfer funds).

In the garden, children playing, garden furniture on decking, pint in hand and having a pointless argument with @Turkish Carlsberg don't do sunny days, but if they did! 😉😇

Maybe you should learn what it is called.

They are not irrelevant at all. Are you denying that strategy decisions can be made above the level of CEO when that CEO is only in charge of one part of a wider group with a parent company? We've already had journalists mention Ankersen being involved in decisions.

Which bit are you saying no to?

Yet again, you've cherry picked bits out of a reply without reading them in the context they were written. Consider those things you listed in the context of a post that includes the bits I've put in bold.

Yet again, you fail to address anything in the post. Top avoidance!

The same applies to responsibilities as it does duties. While CEOs share core responsibilities (like financial sustainability, governance, and leadership), the emphasis and scope of those responsibilities vary depending on the club’s size, structure, ownership, and current goals. One CEO might be a strategist, another a day-to-day operator, it’s not one-size-fits-all. Kraft or Ankersen may have had responsibilities people are trying to use as something to tarnish Pasons with. We just do not know! The very nature of Saints being a part of a wider group makes things less clear in regard to who is in charge of strategy.

Your analogy doesn't hold water as Camberley Town are not playing in the division Southampton will be in next season... Coventry are. So experience doing it at the level we will be playing is significantly more relevant.

See last long post.

See last post.

The same applies to responsibilities. While CEOs share core responsibilities (like financial sustainability, governance, and leadership), the emphasis and scope of those responsibilities vary depending on the club’s size, structure, ownership, and current goals. One CEO might be a strategist, another a day-to-day operator, it’s not one-size-fits-all. Kraft or Ankersen may have had responsibilities people are trying to use as something to tarnish Pasons with. We just do not know! The very nature of Saints being a part of a wider group makes things less clear in regard to who is in charge of strategy.

I did what @Turkish said I should do and it ended up showing him to be wrong. I haven't even told you what question I asked it. So what makes my question wrong, how do you know it was wrong and what should I have asked?

Wouldn't it be strange to not judge a manager based on the situation and resources he has available to him at the club he is at?

Bullshit, I know the role thanks. What a CEO is responsible for varies from club to club. Some core responsibilities apply across the board for all CEOs, but there are big differences across the role from club to club.

Asking for evidence someone is responsible for something does not mean you hold the position that you believe that they are not. Why are you not capable of grasping that?

You ignored the question (again) You continue to get the Chat GPT name wrong You suggested using AI to show that CEOs do have the same roles. I quoted from them that they do not show that. Turkish fail after Turkish fail!

I asked first.

Still waiting for an answer.

See my previous post.

Bullshit. Nothing in that post is me saying he was not at fault for the football this season. Asking for evidence someone is responsible for something does not mean you hold the position that you believe that they are not. So it is not me with a black and white view of the world, it is you as you can't see the middle position of withholding belief until evidence supports a position for or against!

Coventry’s rise from where they were when he took charge to the end of the season was pretty impressive.

I did not attack him, just his lies.

Well he mispresented what I said. So that makes it a strawman fallacy. You should know, you do it regularly enough! Do you think I said what he claimed? If so in what post?