You didn't answer the question.
Also, I didn't say millions in the UK would die. I'm struggling to see how you think going back to normal wouldn't see a huge spike in deaths. They are at 30k which is horrific despite social distancing, no social distancing would increase transmission and increase deaths. Please explain why that wouldn't be the case?
So you don't think social distancing reduces transmission rates? The reduction in people standing next to each other clearly reduces virus spreading. I don't see how you can argue against that.
If there is reduction in the virus spreading then there is going to be a reduction in deaths.
You want us to 'go back to normal'... that would lead to an increase in transmission and and increase in deaths!
Why do you think thousands of deaths don't matter?
'Back to normal' would see tens of thousands more people die. People don't want to die or see their relatives die, which is why your suggestion of going 'back to normal' is nuts.
Healthy people in their 20s are not immune from this seriously affecting them, let alone those around them...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-52572794
Away and neutral aren't the same though, a benefit of being away is the home team is often expected by their fans to be on the front foot which opens them up for counter attacks. Games at neutral stadiums won't have an expectation on the 'home' side by their fans.