Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. Tonda Eckert isn't the answer
  2. They are share issues, where the company creates and sells new shares to investors (public or private) to raise capital for growth, operations, or projects, essentially selling ownership for cash without taking on debt like a loan, though it dilutes existing shareholders' stakes. In this case it is the main shareholder buying shares in his own company as a means to put money into the club.
  3. I didn't say it was spent well as the bit in bold states. But the total amount spent was significantly large. It was mainly spent on rubbish players for the level.
  4. We spent a lot of money under SR in the Premier League. The issue wasn't spending money, the issue was what the money was spent on!
  5. The accounts show he has put a lot of additional money into the club.
  6. You think the Championship top scorer is shit? Sure, he isn't great in the Premier League, but that isn't where we are.
  7. You don't think the current Championship top scorer scores goals!
  8. Because he scored vs a bottom half League 1 team and Norwich reserves?
  9. Because we have better players than him in the 343 system, with Scienza and Azaz being preferred for the two behind the striker. Even in a 4231 he isn't better than Fellows, Azaz & Scienza for the three positions behind the striker.
  10. I'm Tonda, and so is my wife!
  11. We were in the bottom half of League One when he died. A lot of money was invested after his death.
  12. It clearly didn't work out, but they've reportedly made a small profit on him in terms of transfer fee. So not a disaster.
  13. He won't at the moment. Saints players have circa 40% wage reductions after any PL relegation.
  14. He made enough mistakes in the last game to not play in the next game.
  15. We play a 1 striker formation. A 4th striker isn't going to get much gametime.
  16. Quite a few in the last game, so the time is now.
  17. Could potentially make a profit on him...
  18. It would be a promotion in job role. We have no vacancy in that role.
  19. What'll that achieve?
  20. Nah, he is dreadful
  21. As ludicrous as the spelling? 🥸
  22. Why would that mean they leave?
  23. No club has every academy player be good enough for the 1st team. The vast majority would make it, with many going into non league. That doesn't mean there isn't a good reason for them to be at the club. You never know for certain how they will develop. Plus we need the academy team to have enough players in their squads, some will be squad filler so that we can play games.
  24. He is a right back, and is not remotely close to being good enough for our first team. He is heading ouf on loan again to Chelmsford in the National League South.
  25. Bragg is the one replacing Jander Matsuki is in the Azaz role
×
×
  • Create New...