Matthew Le God

You want the players to learn to play a system they've not used before in the next 3 days? That is quite a risk! I doubt Puncheon and Rodriguez would be effective wing backs anyway.

So the source is the Daily Star.

That is extremely vague! Who on twitter?

It would be impressive, but signing the England captain/reigning European player of the year is still bigger.

Shaw and the Real Sociedad player are very good actors then.

i know, I was adding to what you were saying to Le Goddard.

As he hasn't managed it by the age of 27, I wouldn't get your hopes up. He is a good Championship level left back and is out of his depth in the Premier League.

Clyne is too old to play for England Under 21's anymore. Players born on or after 1st January 1992 are eligible until the end of the 2015 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship. Clyne was born 5th April 1991.

It was a 3 match ban and he and Ramirez missed the Tottenham, Sunderland and Stoke games at the end of last season.

He was in training on 8th August, as this video shows...

Our first choice defence is probably Shaw, Lovren, Yoshida, Clyne. That wasn't the defence at any point today.

Not particularly. He missed some games with a virus, rather than injury. Again not a sign of injury proneness.

Being injured in a clumsy tackle, does not mean you are injury prone. It could happen to anyone.

So a players clatters into him and that makes him "injury prone"?

Simply means Saints are continuing to use their 4-2-3-1 formation from last season.

And Shaw, as Hodgson is managing the under 21's on Tuesday.

Because Lallana is a better player, despite what a number of people on this forum say.

He is currently in training, just not ready for a game.

Yes, Pochettino signed Osvaldo on loan in January 2010 and then permanently in August 2010.

......

I have had Turkish on my ignore list for the last month.

We've been called "Southampton St Mary's" before, so isn't reverting to older names "traditional"?

You've twisted what I've said quite considerably.

Its hardly a huge change. Their current badge already has a large picture of a tiger and the words "The Tigers" written on it.

Well if Hull stick with Hull City Tigers for 100 years+ like we have with our 4th name then that will become "tradition". People are fixated that football shouldn't change when it does constantly and new "traditions" have been created. Anything that is different from the original club when formed is a deviation from "tradition". I'm not saying Southampton should have a name change, what I'm saying is the whole notion of tradition in football is flimsy.