By "available" I guess you mean out of work, but why do they have to be out of work? Adkins was employed in the Championship when we hired him as a League One club.
And in none of those games did we have Ramirez, Mayuka, Rodriguez, Clyne, Yoshida, S. Davis, Gazzaniga, Shaw, Ward-Prowse or Boruc, so you really can't take much from them.
Why do our January signings have to be "free and low wages", experience is one thing but the players you listed simply aren't any better than we already have. A number of them aren't even "free" anymore having already been signed up by other clubs and many of them have poor injury records.
On what is that statement based?
Saints have been tied to a long term contract (that predates the Liebherr/Cortese takeover) for the website that numerous other club's use. I'd imagine Cortese would want to create the club's own unique site if he could, but the club can't until the contract ends.
Not unreasonable to question credibility if they have shown they can't even get the basics right, such as the chairman's gender.
It says it is based on the 2010/11 accounts. This explains them, the interview is an interesting listen...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17547804
The loan we know little about was in September 2012 and isn't covered by this website Pompey fans are getting all excited about on POL and Twitter.