angelman

The poor girl out side Marchwood. She's been there all day waiting for Gab to be announced.

How many ****s can you fit on one thread?

Oh FFS grow up you silly little boy

Is it? You seem to be a little ahead of me.

Hey ho.

Yes there are. But you often look at them and think how stupid they are. Sensible spending or not? Often not.

Try http://www.eplsite.org/stream22.html Not great quality but quite stable.

Or confidence even

Come on Always, isn't it time to stow the boring negative shît?

Bompey offer £18m for him!!!!!

Shane Long - **** me he is frustrating and good.

I do wonder how short the memories of some of our fans are.

Let's sign him

Embarrassing!!

Long is a bit of an enigma. Love his industry, but goals is what it is about. Every time I think we should get someone else in, he goes and scores. Hope he can go on one of his good streaks.

Murphy maybe be a bit monotonal, but what he says usually makes sense. And he is not too Liverpool either.

I'm not upset with Sakho going to Palace, given the money involved. If it was less, then I would be happy for him here. If Palace want to spunk all their money away, then that is their wont. Benteke must be pretty damn pricey wage wise, and now if they get Sakho, I imagine he would be on about £100k a week.

Ah, there was me thinking that you knew. Maybe the club know when he is likely to be back.

So Duncan, when is VVD going to be fit again?

Disagree. If VVD wasn't injured people would be saying get a replacement in for Fonte. Treat Stephens as the Fonte replacement. Maybe there are better options, but certainly there aren't any better options based on price. So if VVD gets back on games shortly, we will have 4 CBs. Gardos is still rusty, but has played more than Sakho, who at £20m/£100k/pw is ridiculously expensive and Palace are welcome to him.

I'm sorry, but Fonte has been in this country for plenty long enough and speaks the language plenty well enough to understand the question about the transfer request. To ask a question to clarify what was meant in the manner that he did was overly evasive (and if supposition was the order of the day, was playing semantics).

Well the OS said that VVD was to miss the Swansea game, which I took to mean that it wasn't as bad as all that. If it was bad, then they wouldn't mention the somewhat obvious that he is absent.

Which was?