Sheaf Saint

Oh dear, terrible pass from Wanyama there under no pressure.

J-Rod coming on for SRL.

York 4-1 Pompey

Philips coming on - gets booed. Sad really.

Oh poo. I hope Schneiderlin isn't badly injured.

That's a shocking tackle and well worthy of a yellow.

JWP coming on

No doubt he will be bemoaning the 'stonewall' penalty they should have had when Chamakh did his birdman impression in the first half.

Double change for Palace.

Now Davis goes close but over the bar. What a different performance this is from the 1st half now.

Lambert close to making it 3-0 - Speroni was beaten.

Waheeeeey! Fooooking awesome!!!!!!!

Hahahah - yeah Alps, Osvaldo is sh*t is he!? Hahahahahahahahaha

How is that not a free kick for climbing all over Lambert!?

Can you give me tonight's lottery numbers please?

The play-acting from Palace today is shocking.

Good pressure here, 3rd straight corner. Need to score now.

Nice quick break from us for once and it creates panic in the Palace defence.

Our defence doesn't seem as solid today as it has in the last few games. Palace are getting a few balls through and causing us problems.

Lucky let off but a definite dive.

Ooooh. So close from Lambert!

Soft booking for Davis that.

That could have been costly. Palace carve us open then.

If anybody is interested in listening to the actual findings of the IPCC then there is a live stream of the presentation from Stockholm available here... http://www.igbp.net/multimedia/multimedia/climatechangeeventlivestream.5.29d2af531409c09b243316.html

Which scientists are you talking to?.... http://scienceprogress.org/2012/11/27479/ I searched the Web of Science, an online science publication tool, for peer-reviewed scientific articles published between January first 1991 and November 9th 2012 that have the keyword phrases “global warming” or “global climate change.” The search produced 13,950 articles.... By my definition, 24 of the 13,950 articles, 0.17 percent or 1 in 581, clearly reject global warming or endorse a cause other than CO2 emissions for observed warming. I do not claim to be an 'expert' in this field by any means (yet), but I am trying to learn as much about it as I can, and as such I am currently undertaking a part-time degree course with the Open University in Environmental studies, where MMGW is taught as 99.9% fact. If there was as much doubt in the scientific community as you claim there is, why would such well-respected educational institutions as the OU be teaching otherwise? Actually I would say the opposite is true. Over recent years Germany has been investing massively in renewable energy technology such as solar. It doesn't seem to have had the negative affect on their economy that scaremongers like to claim it would in Britain. It's all technology at the end of the day, so somebody has to build, install and maintain it, meaning there is a market there for those willing to invest. If we invest in it and the skeptics turn out to be right, then all it means is that we will have created a cleaner, more sustainable world for nothing. Whereas if we do nothing about it, and the skeptics turn out to be wrong, then the whole of the civilised world is screwed. That's a pretty big gamble IMO, and not one that we should be taking. Yes, I completely agree.