SaintBobby

It's all a balance IMHO. I like the way the squad has been built and the "buy young and hungry" strategy. But there is something to be said for age, experience and leadership. I think we may be a tad lacking here.

I think how much we spend on transfers is just one end of the issue. We should look on the whole package of wages and transfers. Robert Green on a free transfer would eat up a major chunk of our budget, for example. I'm sure we'll spends more than an additional £20m on new players. But a good % will be salaries.

This seems an argument for more signings, not early signings.

I'm delighted. I plead a hefty degree of personal ignorance - have seen him play just 3 times plus the obvious highlights/clips etc. But all the "background noise" is good. He's clearly highly rated by Adkins as well as other top flight managers. Young, bags of potential, voted by his fellow pros in Championship team of year, played for Eng U-21s etc etc But, I'll try and wait for ten games or so before forming a firm view. After all, I was a shoulder shrugger on Hoovield signing and an air puncher when we snapped up Agustin Delgado...

That's even more moronic, why would we pay £1m for the privilege of playing a friendly against Wolves? Would make sense if it was maybe £50K - £100K, but not at £1m - we may as well just write them a cheque.

Southampton now hold the all time league record for the number of consecutive games in which they have avoided defeat if leading at half time (now something like 50ish?)

I'd say a major improvement, but may be wrong. May turn out disappointing, sure. But seems to be highly regarded and definitely destined for Premiership. Not sure Sharp had any Prem clubs after him. £7m-ish surely reflects this (e.g. I'd be amazed if we sign a player at that level as a back-up or squad player)

I hear ya. Am just saying if Kelvin is say a B+ and Green an A-, this isn't as big a gain as replacing, say, Richardson (C+) with Clynne (B+++)

Moyes is an utterly superb manager. I'm amazed he's still at Everton. My other ideal candidate if something awful happened to NA would be Martinez. Must admit, the rollercoaster of the last few years has left me disorientated about who we might realistically attract and who we can't. I still haven't got used to thinking of us as a Premier League club again.

I reckon Green is better than Kelvin, but not by much. Also, there are disruption risks (Kelvin is a big force in the dressing room etc). If we are going to spend really big bucks, I'd like to do it on players who are much better than our presenting starting XI and very likely to play a large majority of games if fit. For example, I'd say J-Rod is a major improvement on Sharp so merits a massive outlay. Yes, I know it's a squad game, there will be injuries, loss of form etc etc. But I'd probably prefer to spend the £2.5m pa we might give to Green on a much better right back or right winger.

Not saying you're wrong, but motivation is important. E.g. Leeds was essentially an evolution - and a successful one. Based on footballing decisions. If e.g. we were relocated to Bristol and rebranded the Southern Red Bulls, I'd have a major sense of humour failure. Even if someone could show me that the club would now be much more successful and would sell more replica kits in Thailand.

Lol. I'm not alone then. This should delight all those posters who say we don't move fast enough? :-)

It's madness as far as I can see. It's not so much the change of colour (although that's bad enough), it's the implication that changing the kit to red and having a dragon as the main logo will lead to a surge in support in Kuala Lumpur. Are Asian football fans so easily seduced?

It seems to me that being blind or deaf significantly impairs someone's experience of the game, whereas being wheelchair-bound doesn't necessarily. If more space is made available for someone in a wheelchair and a helper, should they pay 2 or 3 times the amount? After all, for a sell out match, that's 2 or 3 able bodied people who can't get in to SMS and the club's bank balance suffers accordingly.

Actually, I wldnt say no to Skacel returning. Even if he only seems to play well for Hearts. Guthrie would be a great free signing. Especially if Hammond is leaving (I guess he will be, but no source for this)

That's a great list. And cheered me up! I don't think we will finish above all of them, but have a fair chance of finishing above three of them. I'd add Reading and possibly Fulham to the list.

Can't see us making Chelsea green with envy with what we spend. And I'm kind of assuming/guessing this is only about 50% of the transfer budget. If we are seeking to spend, say, 80+% of our available funds on J-Rod, this would seem very odd indeed!

If you can't afford a season ticket, I'm surprised you're looking forward to away games on the continent.

Was the initial question "can you name the 20 Premier League clubs?" Errr.....ummm.....

God knows. Swansea's budget must be huge in comparison. Gees.

I have 3 season tickets for me and the family, will probably go up to four for this season. Only really go to London away games. But not sure how/if I'd help other folk queue jump on away tickets using my numbers. Open to suggestions though!

What on Earth is strange about the Davis family moving house? His salary has probably just doubled. If my salary doubled, I'd move house.

That sounds about right - 7%ish compound interest. Above inflation, but not by miles. Of course, the disposal income of the earning, adult population in Hampshire has gone up massively over last 20-30 years, so you'd expect ticket prices to reflect that. (there's a limited number of seats and more cash chasing them, basically)

Sure, that may apply to him. That's fine. I get that. Similarly, Kelvin would probably prefer to stay at Saints than move to, say, Fulham. Each case is separate, of course. But, overall, on aggregate, we should be able to outbid and outspend Swansea and attract better players. That doesn't mean we should have bought Sigurdsson. Or that he didn't have some particular attraction to Swansea. Maybe we shouldn't. Maybe he did. But - in total - we are able to spend more money and attract better (new) players than Swansea. Anyone who doesn't get that basic point is just wrong, sorry.

Yes, it's very easy to explain that. Their income was higher, but their expenditure was much higher too. Their anticipated budget over the next few years is lower than Saints, most likely. I'm not sure what you mean by "forgetting our owner". The fact that we can risk big losses (by the look of it) enables us to both (a) gamble and (b) plan over a longer time horizon. Once again, if we can't outbid Swansea (which we can) we are in serious, serious trouble. This doesn't mean we can outbid Spurs, Man Utd, Barcelona etc. Just that we can outbid the two or three smallest teams in the top flight.