farawaysaint

If it goes to pens can’t get much more experiences than Walcott and Long I guess.

In the immortal words of Nige. Respect the point.

Ok the average in the last 10 seasons is 35 points 🙄 Bit of a pedantic correction entirely missing the point of the post but sure.

Well, that’s Newcastle off the list of teams I thought we could always give a good game against. Let’s put this in context, their owners are 15? times richer than City’s owners. There are probably about six teams in the league now I think we can realistically expect to beat. 40 points every year is a tough ask going forward.

Are we sleepwalking to relegation yet?

Everything in our favour here. Westham superior all over the park, Westham second in the form table, Westham haven't lost to us in 7? Meetings... Erm what was I saying?

This is quite obviously the point of his post yes.

“Why can’t we keep our best players???” Article about lad who has been with us his entire life getting a pay rise on 5 year contract…. “How can we pay so much???” Before anyone asks yes I genuinely believe our captain deserves the money in this age of frankly stupid PL wages. My only hope is that there is a pay cut clause in the case of relegation or else we are a bit buggered should the worst happen.

I believe in us, go sports team!

Hooray.

Meh, we never won first day. Write off, strengthen, finish 12-17 rinse and repeat for 10 more years until we get relegated again.

So, who are we jealous of this year?

Who needs fullbacks when we have Claus Killer and Niemi? I would kill for a fully fit Niemi.

Sweden? Killer, Anders and Ostlund? Edit: Jakobsson too, we have had a few Swedes.

I genuinely thought he would finish his career with us 🤣 Did the big club bit already, childhood fan… If we can’t keep him then why bother with anyone to be frank.

On the plus side Armstrong and Adams looked good!

Right so we are due a win.

10-0 win Saints showing why we are a top 6 side.

Absolutely! The team that beat us 9-0 have shown that the team we are about to play are not unbeatable 😉

To play devil’s advocate, I am very much for impeachment but some of the republican congressmen’s arguments in the hearing made a lot of sense. Specifically the two I thought were quite strong were that a snap impeachment without witnesses set a bad precedent and that given the level of planning Trump’s speech couldn’t have directly invited the revolt. He deserves to be impeached for pressuring elected officials to overturn the vote and his inflammatory rhetoric but I think the dems got the article and timing potentially wrong. Already was very little chance of it passing a senate supermajority vote but having heard the arguments against I think the chances are practically nil.

I disagree that impeachment is pointless. There needs to be some form of consequence so no future elected official tries this. They are limited in terms of mechanisms to formally rebuke the president, I know some have proposed censure but to be honest Trump being the only president in history to be impeached twice is fitting.

But saying no politics is in itself censorship? The irony of Trump’s ban is that he was campaigning hard for the removal of section 230, the very section that allowed him and others to post whatever they felt like without fear of repercussion. Removing this protection would force all social media platforms to adjudicate each and every post or face criminal liability.

I think there is an interview with someone who was next to her directly after the fact. He explains that she didn’t listen to warnings and they tried to pull her away.

Madness in PA yesterday, republicans going full coup mode.

Fantastic win and three points! Been a funny old season really, no idea who will take the league.