Turkish

The rot started after we lost at home to Reading, that was when the relationship between Adkins and Cortese started to break down, he was a dead man walking from then on.

What is your view on some fans on here describing your loyalty and love for the club as you just being an employee paid to do a job?

Can you imagine the meltdown on here if he'd only thanked Spurs in that tweet.

MPs record isn't much better than Adkins FACT. He was hailed as the man to take us to the next level. FACT. Within weeks of his arrival Adkins, who had previously been dubbed by some 'the new Alex Ferguson, the next great manager and a future England manager' was forgotten about and a lot claimed MP was so much better and Adkins was out of his depth and not the man to continue our unstoppable match to the champions league. Some fans patronisingly claimed they hoped he could find a job at his level, like Leeds, a nice midtable championship club and maybe get a crack at the premier league again one day, when only the previous summer people were bricking it LIVERPOOL might pinch him. So the problem with that post is???

Quite right Brett* * was her your most embarassing mongboard moment?

'This squad is good enough for 6th'

You often prove the point that experience and knowledge doesn't equal age Young Andy.

Agreed. We see it all the time. A poster expresses an opinion the majority don't like and its trolling,,regardless of the validity of the post.

For the man to take is to the next level his record is remarkably similar to the that if the clueless bumpkin who was out of his depth

And don't forget 10 of those were when we were adapting to the premier league.

This.

Its an Internet forum mate, does anyone's opinion on her mean anything?

And that was before the good posters stopped posting and you can see why!!

Who has had a pop at him?

Don't let the wet fannies and trolls ruin it for you mate, you're better than that.

Well it doesn't seem we do as your stats PROVE and that's the only club I care about.

But you said statistically it isn't. So despite supposedly playing well and having more shots at goal we aren't winning as many. Your own stats have proven you wrong. Sorry if you don't like it, but that's the FACTS.

Great, so were playing well, having lots of shots at goal and still not winning. So your theory that more shots at goal = more wins isn't working for us it.

So do you get bonus points for good performances and having more shots at goal even if you dont win, then?

But your post about us winning the games where we have more shots at goal is wrong, you said so yourself. I'm not even sure why you're bringing The Sunderland game into it, we had more shots at goal and didnt win, it just emphasises how wrong you are.

Conveniently ignoring the rest of the post I see, well done. Dont like it because you've proven your own point to be wrong.

Not to some on here mate, that was our reason for the poor start.

But as we've been told many times Jamie, that was okay because we were adapting to the premier league then.

Depends what you mean by a good performance, we had lots of the ball because they defended deep, we passed it very slowly and created very little compared to the amount of possession we had. We struggled to score against a team a newly promoted side who are favourites to go down beat easily yesterday. Based on that then no, it wasn't our best performance.

Depends on if it suits what people's agenda is.