Turkish

* points finger and sneers* maysie thinks Reading have the same chance of winning the league as Man City, that is the most mental thing I've ever read in the whole of Innnernezzzz mongboard history and here are some stats to prove it. Man City have a 7.34% chance of winning the league Reading -0.0001224% chance Maysie is mental, sneer, sneer, sneer. But those stats mean nothing as Man City have to play Man United and Reading have to play QPR so have an easier run in but Reading had an easier game Saturday or something.

I'm flattered that you remembered a post I made from June last year, truely flattered, now take that sentence, include it in the rest of the paragraph i wrote and put it in context with the rest of the post and there you gave my whole point. As thick as a whale omelette aren't you princess.

, even now you don't get it and are making stuff up, as that isnt what i said at all. Too thick, as you repeatedly prove.

Again ironic considering only recently you completely made up a post about something I was meant to have said in preseason, when I actually said nothing like that at all.

The only ones I can we talking sh**e are the ones going on and on and on and on and on about West Ham, those making up stats to prove something and immediately admitting their stats are wrong and people like Les Bender and yourself who try as they might seem to find it impossible to do anything but talk sh*te.

5 year deal wasn't it?

Very very dull. I loved the solider who mugged him off a few weeks ago.

And it's completely unlike Saintsweb Mongs to still be going on about it weeks later, like the way you are doing, yes?

Why quote stats and then say they are wrong as Villas stats aren't accurate because they had a couple of easy games and that they don't any hard games teams might have coming up? You admitted yourself on the OP that your stats are a load of bo llocks as soon as you started going on about villa last two fixtures distorting them.

He was definitely up there. Think of the other strikers around at the time. Ronaldo, Batistuta, Raul, Van Nisterlroy, Shevchenko to name a few. to be the undisputed best you're taking about being better than some real greats. He probably could have achieved more but he was at the wrong club, if he'd been at Man United, Arsenal or even Chelsea in his prime it'd been a different story. By the time he want to Real he was starting to dip. In his prime c2000 he was a quality player who could have got into most teams in the world.

As the master of saying things wrong, it's somewhat ironic that you are the one pointing it. Remind me how we are getting on this season with our league one squad. Why don't you stick to making up some statistics then immediately admit they are a load of bo llocks because they don't take into account who future opponents might be or are skewed by who previous opponents have been for other teams like in you did in the OP. it really is gripping stuff.

I expect they do, as will most top clubs.

Its fair to say that in his prime Owen did fullfill his potential and was one of the best strikers in the world. 40 goals in 89 appearances for England and the only English player to score in 4 tournements. Unfortunatly for him in 2005 injuries took their toll on him and he was never the same player as he was at Liverpool.

So you admit you don't know what you're on about then?

Good point, as Ollalanas stats proved at the weekend the team that has the most shots at goal doesn't win in more than 50% of games.

http://www.sportsdirectnews.com/premier-league/19350-adkins-free-to-talk-to-reading.php#.UUiuJhEgGSM http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2292403/Nigel-Adkins-set-tribunal-failing-agree-compensation-deal-Southampton.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/southampton/9925732/Nigel-Adkins-takes-Southampton-to-tribunal-in-bid-to-resolve-feud-with-Nicola-Cortese.html It's no surprise that you are wrong. Its got f*ck all to do with Cortese now, he can take another job now hes stared proceedings after we dicked him about. thought anymore about a front sweeper recently?

I think most people that aren't a complete f*ckwit knew th point he was making. man United wont go down and neither will West Ham, it's no surprise that most of the mugs on here don't understand that point though.

It's got nothing to do with Cortese, why do you think it has? He sacked Adkins and as Adkins is now taking us to a tribural he can work again.

Richardson cant get a game with Yoshida prefered at right back when Clyne has been unavailable. Our first XI is decent and if we can add strength in depth in the summer we can push on to be a midtable side next year.

Crepes actually.

Dont think he's been brought in to save them, they aren't expecting him to. More to give him time to get to know the players and ones he wants to keep or move on and also to indetify new targets to hit the ground running in preseason to bring them back up next season. Seems fair enough.

Good news. I've been trying hard to get my contract extended, even given a reasonable assessment of ours and West Hams chances of staying up on the "remaining games" thread. Not wind ups for a while. Once i've signed the deal i can do a puncheon and revert to type.

My sources told me last night it could be completed as early as today.

He just simply wasn't good enough.

And ones that shout "go on 'oover" in thier broadest farmers accent whilst laughing and look around to see if anyone else is. Ones that scream "dont mess about with it, get it foooooooooooorward" when we are clearly playing possession football. Ones who get on the usual players back regardless of how well or badly they are playing yet applaud a misplaced 10 yard pass by one of the golden boys as shout "unlucky". It can't just be Saints but we do seem to have an unusually high percentage of scruffy, stupid dinlows with who seem to be watching another game to me.