Turkish

You really are a complete and utter cock aren't you.

1 its full of MONGS 2. It's run by MONGs (not Steve G, he is okay) 3. It's full of MONGS* * i thought there are so many MONGS on here is deserved mentioning it twice.

Interesting how Baj makes a statement accusing me of making something up and then closes the thread before i can reply. anyway, 2 more points for this but f*ck it. Want me to forward you the PM? In fact f*ck it i'll put in on here. Stop making stuff up Barry. Now please explain how saying i am not a mouth frother is offensive.

MONG Well, that should be the 8 a need for a permenant ban by my reckoning. If i dont get to say goodbye it's been a pleasure discussing stuff with some of you over the last few years. All the best.

Well this place is full of MONGS. *bends over and takes two more points*

Get on the UI mate, that has it's moments and no infraction points for caling BAJ A MONG. * bends over and takes two more points*

Nice, enjoy mate. I'm just going to retire from internet MONG boards. *bends over and takes two more points*

mong, mouth frother, hardly saying he wanted to devide and rule was it.

Dont forget to cancel your paypal subscription, i will be.

I try but i just cant patronise as well as they can.

Yes it was, someone called me a mouth frother and i replied saying i wasn't and got infracted for that post for insulting another member!!

Who gives f*ck anyway hey Jamie, this place is dying on it's arse anyway.

Well this is true. An the infractioner didn't even have the decency to repond to my PM when i questioned the infraction. What exactly is offesive or insulting about saying "Conversely for you reactionary mouth-frothers' err, not me fella. Wont catch me mouth frothing talking about nonsense on an internet forum with you mongs." I'd say it's more a statement of fact.

I think this one will come back to haunt us, a much better left back than Harding, who Nige seems to thinks can do no wrong and younger as well IMO.

Is there an appeal procedure in place for these? I know it's pointless as Baj rules this forum with a fist of iron and he'll jsut uphold them anyway but to be given an infraction for insulting someone because i said i wasn't a mouth frother, which is what they had called me is seriously odd. :lol::lol:

If we were all like you the world would be a wonderful little bubble wouldn't it.

Usualy story on here when someone has an alternative view to the accepte one on here. That's the great thing about you liberal forum superstars, everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it's what yours is.

What DD said.

and you said Alps is an attention seeker. If this isn't an "ohh look at me" post what is?!!

As DD says, when there is no doubt whatsoever (such as filming the f*cking thing) and when it's crimes against children, acts of terrorism or serial killers. Huntley should have hung for example. Any cold blooded murder should also be considered. It shouldn't be on the say so of one judge either, after conviction it should go to three judges, after the first judge has made his decision, as they do in the court of appeal. Barristers can then argue it out with the three judges.

If it was anyone on here the murderer wouldn't die though, they'd spend the whole time trying to understand and empathise with them as to why they did it.

Like you did with you fantastic planet Alpina, patronising drivel?

I'm all for an eye for an eye etc so to be executed the way they killed the victim.

He is actually making a very good point yet as usual the forum superstars are coming up with sarcastic and belittling responses rather than come up with any suitable alternative. I am sure Verbal would be chomping at the bit for public hanging if the child was black though.

Shearer didn't do too badly for himself either did he.