Turkish

Does that include the tiger that is Mr D?

It's quite a simple concept to grasp. Many of you profess to be liberal and are all for freedom of speech, yet at the same time are condeming the EDL for voicing their beliefs. You all claim they are a violent group that intimidate but i was called an idiot for stating the fact that the student protests were far more violent. It seems many of you are liberal only when it suits and freedom of speech is only allowed if it is what you believe in. Liberal? I'd say hyprocrites is more appropriate.

Violence is violence, yet somehow you seem to justify it when its the students or a group that fit into your agenda, yet condemn it when it's one that doesn't. Surely it's the same thing, regardless of who does it?

I'd rather be thought an idiot than be a hypocrite that says one thing but does another. Are you saying the EDL have no right to march? Are you saying that the EDL marches were more violent than the student protests? Why am i an idiot? Because i am questioning the mainstream view on here and outed you all as narrow minded hyprocrites, the very thing that you claim not to be?

But this is the society you lot wanted. Tolerant, liberal, freedom of speech. Like it or not, the EDL have as much right to march and hold their views under the society you want as anyone. Despite all these horror stories about how they act there were far more arrests at the student protests. I never see EDL members smashing up police vans and throwing fire extingishers off of buildings into crowds. One might think that the way they supposedly act is a media driven campaign to make them look bad? As the facts figures of arrests and actual violence make them appear to be the pacifists that they claim to be compared to the middle class students and the UAF. People want it both ways, they want a free liberal society but they only want it if people agree with the views they hold. It hyprocritical, if you cant except the EDL and live and let live, then you are as bad as them. In the society you want the EDL and BNP have as much right to be here as anyone else.

Just to confirm, when i said Nicholas Deakins, i was talking about man shoes for Jamie.

I am not sticking up for anyone, but given how liberal you all are then you are hypocrites for critising the EDL for their beliefs.

In that case i want to know who the women are that own one or two, because every woman i know owns loads, bizarrely, many of them look the same.

Bet he doesn't.

You're a mug, still too much for a bird you've not been with long. Get her down to Sole Trader, Aldo or Office and be done with it. Plus Sole Trader have got some nice Nichola Deakins in at the moment you can pick up for just short of £200.

Oh no, i get it. I just find it amazing that people can roundly condem the EDL for standing up for what they believe in, yet at the same time, giving the cyber round of applause to dear old Elton for his statement, whilst at the same time preaching equal rights. Dont forget we had people calling jesus and the apostles "knuckle draggers" on one thread for writing the bible and the beliefs of christianity. Who decides what we should and shouldn't tolerate anyway?

i bet she does! Why are you making up having a girlfriend anyway Jamie? Last time we spoke about women you'd just been dumped. if you do have one surely you haven't been with a bird long enough to spend £1k on a pair of shoes. If you do you are a bigger mug than you appear on here.

because some people will believe anything if it fits with their agenda.

They are allowed to be, we live in a tolerant society where anything goes.

It seems to work as you are all talking about them. Although strangely in a condeming way. I'd have thought you'd be throwing around the superlatives at the effective way they are making themselves known in this tolerant society you have longed for.

People cant have it both ways, in a tolerant society it would be hypocritical to condemn the EDL for marching for their beliefs.

As i said on the other the thread. You lot are liberal, you want a tolerant society, you helped create it. The EDL are only standing up and marching for their beliefs. Give the society you want they should be applauded. Or is it a case of they can only march if it is for what you want them to believe in?

Why? As TDD says they are standing up for their beliefs. You lot are liberal, you should be delighted by it.

nah, you're cramping my style.

:lol: You and me both.

what you hijacking every post with your sh*t? Nah, its only the internet, some people take it too seriously.

Oh we are overun with them telling us what they think of the EDL, however they are only excercising their rights. If we are as tolarent as we like to think we are then we should listen to their voice and applaud them without condemation.

I dont see what your problem is. You lot are tolerant, you wanted this sort of society, the EDL have as much right to take to the streets and demostrate as gays, students, religious groups, industrial unions etc. You wanted this society and you helped create it. So stop getting yourselves at it and applaud them taking advantage of the rights you have allowed them.

And who decides how much is too much? Who decides when it is correct to be tolerant? AS TDD says do the liberals respect the EDL right for freedom of speech? and the BNP for that matter.

this.