Turkish

I bet you also think it's okay to drive at 37 in a 30 as well dont you pal. Justifying it as you didn't run anyone over. Don't worry mate, if you want to support a criminal enterprise then that's up to you. Personally i'd rather stay the right side of the law.

If anyone in the videos has not given their consent he cannot use them and is sharing them illegally.

In any case Sky don't need too, so you clearly have no understanding of the law. An image of a crowd or a section of a crowd then data protection laws do not apply, so SKy can use these images without containing personal consent of every individual. However in the case of this VLOG most of the people captured in the image will not be the whole or section of the crowd, but individuals sitting or standing near where the VLOG is being filmed. In this instance everyone near with a risk of being filmed needs to be advised they will be filmed, what the video will be used for an either give their consent or given the opportunity to move. As this is an all seater stadium with tickets allocated to seats moving to another seat would likely not be possible so therefore any capture of their image is illegal and the video cannot be used.

Two wrongs don’t make a right always.

Perhaps for some. Not sure what they’re meant to be jealous of. Like marijuana though because it’s popular with young people it doesn’t make it legal. Using someone’s image without their consent is a breach of personal data. The minimum requirement is people in the videos need to be made aware their images will be used and gain their consent otherwise it’s illegal in afraid.

Yet 12% likes a weird bloke putting 50,000 gum balls into a Lego pool. So there we have it. Owen the saints VLOG, 3 times more popular than Ben Stokes World Cup winning innings yet only half as popular as a moron putting balls into a Lego swimming pool. Sums up the target demographic of this VLOG. No wonder you defend it so passionately.

For starters she didn’t start a thread on a forum which is 5 pages long which is basically her congratulating herself on it.

Plenty of people I know have watched it and think it’s a load of sh*t, they’re not enjoying the experience. You’re making the false assumption everyone who watches it watches it all the way through and loves every second. A lot of people, myself included will watch a minute, realise it’s utter bilge and turn it off. The fact is that it only had 223 likes which is less than 6% of the viewers and an even tinier fraction of our total fan base. The stats do not support the claim you made, sorry about that but you’re wrong however much you might not like it.

Why? I’m not the one claiming stats prove how popular they are. They don’t. That’s not my fault.

You said stats suggest people enjoy the vlogs, the stats suggest anything but. You’ve simply quoted the number of views it had and passed this off as some sort of compelling evidence people are crawling all over each other to see them. You brought stats into this not me, so don’t get upset that you were wrong.

You're assuming they mean violence. When in fact what they could mean is "sort him out" by giving him advice to improve the filming and content of his VLOG. Unfortunately people are quick to see the negatives in the way they think, perhaps they were going to offer some constructive criticism as to his performance and perhaps, as I have endevoured to do, offer advice on how he may be subject to legal proceedings.

Not really. The amount of views is irrelevant. It would need to have more than 50% likes for you to be right in your claim that "Stats show the majority of people like it" even then you're not polling the entire opinion of saints fans. As you can see on here quite a few people don't bother watching it as it's not their thing, so for the video to have achieved less than 6% likes despite it being "the thing" of the views is evidence as to how unpopular it is.

It's received 203 likes out of of 4,257 views on youtube, so that figure suggests only 4.7% of people who viewed it enjoyed it. Also interesting that pretty much everyone who has posted on here about it has said "not my thing but...…." So most people on here don't really get it either. I'm not bullying, im just pointing out a few facts and warning the young man that he could be opening himself up to legal action. If anything I'm doing him a favour by putting things into perspective, not letting him get swept away on a wave of self-hysteria. I had to laugh at young Owens comment above "Did I ever imagine there’d be a day where Southampton FC post a video on their YouTube channel, in which I interview Mark ‘The Beast’ Labett off The Chase? Funnily enough, no." No young man, I never imagined a time when people would film themselves making faces into a camera for 90 minutes week after week, upload it to social media and then congratulate yourself on how wonderful it was.

So with saints average attendance of around 31,000 that means that only 12.9% of our average attendance have viewed it. You're also assuming everyone liked it, I would suggest this is not the case at all. So stats DO NOT suggest that people enjoy them.

What stats are these?

Should I ever appear in one of your videos without my consent rest assured I will seek legal advice around the use of my images in your VLOGs. Initial research suggests that you may be in breach of clause 23.6 of the GDPR act as well as leaving yourself liable to a host of other legal action which I will instruct my solicitor to pursue. You have been warned.

I think my favourite one of these was the one when you cried. Was it Cardiff?

Two bits of advice You really shouldn't share so much of your personal information on an anonymous football forum where no one knows or cares who you are You really shouldn't take an anonymous football forum so seriously that you feel you need to share so much of your personal information

He isn’t selling a ticket, he’s offering to buy one. It’s not the same as trying to rip of another fan by charging more than face value for a high demand low supply ticket. He is willingly offering to part with his cash not demanding more because he’s trying to sell. Completely different thing.

Surely the first season in league one? We were utterly dreadful the few seasons before that and Pardew rebuilt the team in the two windows signing players who would be key to our rise. Lambert and Fonte obviously two out the best best signings we’ve ever made but Hammond, Harding, Barnard, Jaidi and even Puncheon all played a part in our promotions.

More recently James Maddison chose Leicester over us and look how good he’s turned out.

Clubcall was wonderfully awful. I remember them announcing we had signed Alun Armstrong, who was a very talented young Stockport striker in the mid90s only for him to sign for Middlesbrough a few hours later

We even had a song for him too What’s the story, David’s Astori weeeeeeeeeeeeellllllllll

Didn’t we try to sign Trevor Francis in around 82/83 but something went wrong and we ended up with Frank Worthington who only scored a couple of goals the season we finished second? Surely if we’d have got him we’d have won something in that period between 81-85. I think it was In Strachans book he also said we could have got Dider Drogba before he went to Marseille for around £2m but Lowe knocked it back because he was too similar to James Beattie

no Jim Brennan? no Lee Molyneux? No credibility for this thread