View From The Top

Pretty brave 1st goal but you are correct that they certainly didn't "hit us" and for anyone to suggest that we'd be sussed out is daft at best.

Carlisle, Oldham, Gillingham were all from the same positions/mistakes at RB/RM.

Our chink, dare I say, is the RB position.

But they didn't, which is the point.

As that's the family centre I very much doubt it.

And give me a Cannuck over either.

Out of interest whereabouts did you get it done and how much?

The one where Verbal dimisses his views as he doesn't believe he's read the Koran? Verbal's views on the BNP/EDL are as balanced as the neo-fascists he obviously, rightly, hates and he carries that attitude into everything he writes. A pity as he obviously a clever bloke with an interesting insight but is so blinkered it makes him as bad as SRS.

Ah, bless, the gimp2 has come to help out gimp1.

You weren't remotely amusing the 1st time you did it and you're continual use really shows up your lack of imagination and intelligence. No surprise really.

Carlisle = Lapse in concentration in the RMF/RB position. Gillingham = Mistake by RB and a good finish. Southend = Silly foul resulting a direct freekick. Oldham = Mistake by RMF exposing RB. MKD = Silly foul by Jaihdi and direct fee kick. Orient = Well rehearsed set piece and and own goal. Clearly the formation that's wrong.

I wouldn't say he's superb but he's currently an excellent impact player. Too many people cracking one off over a player we've not seen play a whole 90mins in a league game.

What's the betting that he got booked for leaving the playing area!

If he sits there.

As some of them were/are arch luvvies I guess they'd be saying things were better under the Dark Lord. Only an idiot, and they're are many on this site, believe that the 1st 1/2 dozen games or so weren't about getting the correct players in and the shape right, in other words, our pre-season.

Say we start with 4-4-2, fail to score for 65mins, then what? I'm happy with 4-5-1/4-3-3, which works, and then having the option for change if required.

Oh, shock horror. Gimp 1 post is closely followed by gimp 2. Well done gimps.

I think, like many, felt that this was a banana skin game. To come back from 2 down was a great effort and proof that we are back and we mean business.

Since you stopped going as we were rubbish I'll treat everything you say with contempt.

We are about to find out how far we've come.

It is the sort of game we usually f**k up.

In. I've no issue with the € either, which is a complete volte face from my position when it was 1st introduced.

It's his attempt at being intelligent/ironic. One of the other alter ego gimps that he's mates with will be along to type more ******s shortly.

Advice you should heed yourself.

Doesn't hide the fact you're fu**ed.