hypochondriac

Yeah pretty much this. Respect the other bloke arguing because he didn't get all uppity and insulting about it.

Eh? No it isn't.

So basically there aren't any, just a few harmless comments on an internet forum. Thanks for overreacting though.

Where are the heavily prejudiced bernard manning jokes on this forum?

Comedy can only be funny if it has a serious message behind it. That's the only comedy to like or it is prejudiced.

So is family guy full of prejudice then?

TBF they do like to make a drama out of everything.

OK so it is the quality of my jokes that you dislike rather than the jokes themselves? That is of course an entirely different issue and nothing to do with prejudice at all. The Bear liked my previous effort with Partridge but I was running out of gay joke material on youtube TBF.

Careful Turkish. You aren't allowed more than a couple of gay jokes or it's prejudice.

Ah so intent IS important!

Please tell me how many jokes are acceptable per thread and on what topics.

Utterly pathetic. Shame they can't all be sacked.

That is an important difference IMO. If you were singling a player out and calling them a f*cking bender it is a huge difference from singing does your boyfriend know you're here to Brighton fans.

Ah I see so a few jokes on a messageboard on different subjects is actually prejudice. It's a shame that you feel that way. Peter Herbert likes to get angry about perceived prejudice where there is none as well. Maybe you should contact him as you appear to have a lot in common: http://www.itv.com/news/london/topic/society-of-black-lawyers/ I am interested in this subject but not with homosexuality itself. I'm happy for people to do whatever they like in private as long as it's legal. I'm pleased that in real life my friends be they black, gay, short or whatever are able to give and receive jokes and banter without being labelled prejudiced.

What is your favourite Madonna album Toon Saint? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ussdmwks_h8

Good point.

OK so if an overtly gay supporter singles themselves out by fighting or mugging the opposition fans off is it then acceptable to chant about their feminine appearance or the fact they are holding a man's hand (if that is what they are doing.)

So when we sing dirty northern b*stards is that not the same thing?

But what does them being fat have to do with them having a penchant for a punch up? Maybe it is glandular and they cannot help it. So is wotsit on his head not acceptable then? Would you consider it as unacceptable as does your boyfriend know you're here? What about the Kevin Phillips chants? He couldn't help his girlfriend cheating on him. Are let him die chants acceptable? or she fell over? What about shooting pompey scum or the one the skate sing about hitting scummers with bricks?

Eh? I made a couple of jokes on a thread about homosexuality. I also made a couple of jokes about people who wear burkhas today but I'm not obsessed with it. Odd thing to say. I didn't deny that homophobia exists (note the reply above where I said that saying faggot is clearly unacceptable) I just don't think there is a higher amount of it in football than in normal society.

Odd that you would pigeon-hole views that differ from your own (conservative) as being from WUMs. It says much about your mentality...

I don't think there are any anti-gay chants. There are anti-Brighton chants aimed at poking fun at a stereotypical trait of a city.

Don't think I have insulted you really, just made a few jokes on a messageboard and also tried to put across my own point of view. Toon saint is the worst example.

What about chanting paedo at westwood? Or wotsit on his head? What about whose the slapper in the pink when we played millwall? Or he's got bigger tits than you when the two fatties squared up a few season back? How do we find out what is and isn't acceptable to chant?

Thanks for being able to debate with civility unlike a few of the other posters who appear to have some repressed sexual feelings of their own.