hypochondriac

You mean like Harding is meant to challenge fox? Butterfield challenging Richardson? Lambert is challenged by? Fonte? Jos? We have a number of decent players but lets not pretend that we don't have first team starters who will play in the majority of games when fit, because we do. In pretty much every team in the country there is a first team goalkeeper. Or do you think that the likes of Joe Hart are competing every week with for a starting place?

Makes sense if we do actually buy some quality. I would like to see some proven NPC quality brought in though because we can't afford to let people bed in. We don't have time.

I don't think we will but if we do, it will be for backup to Kelvin. It certainly won't be the top priority.

Yet we have gained points thanks to the brilliance of Kelvin. The keeper does not need replacing and certainly not in January.

That isn't the whole story. Would I rather be 1st on a terrible run with a difficult load of games coming up or a couple of points off 1st on a great run? Difficult choice.

Why do you keep posting about a new keeper? That is nowhere near the top priority.

Good point well made

Don't be a fool

Obviously I was being sarcastic. Absolutely nothing wrong with using the available evidence to make a judgement on a player before they have played for us.

Actually very funny. I laughed.

You seem to be saying that the debt from markus should be ignored. We can't count the debt as definite but equally we can't dismiss it.

That's probably because guly has played in almost every game this year both good and bad tbf.

By the same token, you can just dismiss that debt.

How dare you judge him without seeing him play. This sort of thing is simply unacceptable.

Not at all surprising from what I was told.

Ah it's obviously to do with Jill selling her kittens then.

Jill I would very much be interested in this. I have met dsm and he was very pleasant at the time!

I second that.

I don't have to take any posting advice from you. You replied to a post so I assumed you were referring to this specific situation. If you really feel you have to post about me then I would take the Canada saint approach and suggest you do it via pm. Not everyone gives me a hard time, plenty of regular posters (most posting on the old saints forever i notice before some of the stranger ones came here) are able to disagree and have a proper debate without the silliness and without targeting the individual poster instead of post content. It doesn't surprise me that you choose to see me as a wum (despite a wealth of evidence over many years to the contrary.) rather like Canada saint it suits you to dismiss what I write rather than engage me in a proper debate or even be civil. The fact you think you have 'put me in my place' is frankly laughable. I will be having an excellent new year in London. Thanks for asking.

That has absolutely nothing to do with this situation.

Ffs stop bringing me up by name in your weird bleatings and then angling for a private message! If you continually refer to me unfairly on here then don't be surprised if I bring it up in public seeing as you have no problem with it. If you didn't keep referring to something that happened months ago then I wouldn't be saying anything. I know exactly what happened at the time thanks. You are the one intent on rewriting history.

You know what you did. The fact you try to justify it when you are proven wrong time and time again shows the type of person you are.

Wtf are you on about? Did you even bother to read my posts from yesterday? Cretin.

Tbf mw3 isn't hugely different from the last one. In fact there are elements that I prefer from mw2.

You were the only one saying I was not a true fan. Why you have to keep mentioning me in your posts I have no idea. Fact is you said I wanted saints to fail. That is not the case, and subsequent posts have proven that. I posted some comments in the heat of the moment past season after one match and yet you continue to refer to it. I sometimes get annoyed when we perform poorly. It's not a common occurrence as you suggest. Kindly leave me out of your posts in future.