Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    43,356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Oh he has definitely been on here. I know because he took issue with some of the things I have said on here in the past. Normally he says things like "I never go onto their site but I just happened to this one time." It's amusing.
  2. No idea. I have been banned three times. The first time I deserved it but the next two times I just tried to be civil and sensible. You made a very fair post there. I reckon even if I was a skate I would still feel the club deserved punishment because of how much they have completely taken the p*ss. In fairness, it seems like PompeyScot gets that, but many of them do not.
  3. You will be banned almost straight away.
  4. A post from corp ho on POL:
  5. Most likely copies or off the back of a lorry too. At least if you buy in town you know they aren't nicked.
  6. GFA! GFA! Ha. Good penalty.
  7. Doesn't seem like a requirement we care about that much.
  8. I'll never forget the time you beat my arcade score with the man and his little sword fighting green goo monsters. It's still upsetting.
  9. Original Bournemouth saint is a spazzer.
  10. I'll buy it off you for 80 quid.
  11. Good read about Gazza here when he was linked with Sunderland in January: http://www.not606.com/content.php/1779-Sunderland-and-Paulo-Gazzaniga
  12. I didn't dismiss it outright. There was a big difference between the two statements, you were wrong and I'm glad you agree. Thanks for the apology.
  13. So I didn't dismiss it outright then. Didn't think I did.
  14. I get it perfectly. I just don't consider it likely. Unless you know something I don't?
  15. Where? I said it was unlikely and I highly doubt it.
  16. Not necessarily. It is possible that we decided that this messing around wasn't worth it and that we will see what happens with what we have. That decision isn't necessarily influenced by a two week period where Shaw has performed well.
  17. I just don't believe we decided not to sign Buttner because of Shaw. It is obvious from the press and his comments that this messing around changed our minds.
  18. It's possible to give youth players a chance whilst still signing good players should the youth players not progress. I mean AOC displaced a couple of players simply because he performed better than them. The same thing could conceivably happen here.
  19. Yes but it would be interesting to see if we sign one keeper or two.
  20. What has changed recently that would mean that the plans are accelerated? They must have known about his ability beforehand and a couple of weeks ago we were set to sign this guy. I highly doubt we scrapped this because we suddenly decided to go with Shaw instead.
  21. That isn't saying much. Knowing how good he is may give a clue as to whether we sign him for the future or put him up against Davis right away.
  22. Not much info to go on though. What's he like?
  23. Wonder if he will be our only keeper of the window?
  24. Exactly. I highly doubt that we have fundamentally changed our transfer dealings just because of a couple of pre season games. At any rate, I would like Shaw to be brought in gradually.
×
×
  • Create New...