hypochondriac

Erm that looks like 23% to me and a higher percentage were younger, thus proving my point.

Sensible was the wrong choice of words. What I meant was that they are actually voting for a workable alternative. Good or bad, Labour would be able to be in charge of the country should they win an election tomorrow. The same cannot be said for the Lib Dems. It's completely ridiculous to suggest that the Lib Dems are a credible alternative to the two leading parties and so those who vote for them can't really be taken seriously. I currently disagree with Labour policies, but I can respect those who vote for them and I cant say I wouldn't vote for them in the future. Lib Dems? No chance.

Many Lib Dem policies from the election were unworkable and silly. They only came up with most of them because they knew they wouldn't win an election. The Lib Dems don't really stand for anything, and most who vote for them are young student types with little understanding of the way of the world. I imagine when they grow up these people vote for a proper party with proper policies as opposed to 'something different.'

Anyone who votes Lib Dem IMO doesn't really know a lot about politics. At least those who vote for Labour believe in something sensible.

Fantastic post. I agree wholeheartedly with every word.

In regards to that last sentence, dune has been saying that about the Tories for ages in fairness to him. Anyway it's excellent news, the sooner we have more distant ties with Europe the better. You only have to see how the French leader basically said that the voice of democracy gets in the way of the European project to see what it's all about. I'm close to voting UKIP at the next general election though I will see.

Agree with this. Buzzin 'Orn used to do it, now that mantle has passed to saintandy and less so Super Mikey. Farawaysaint's reason is the best so far and is encouaging me to post here! (Use tapatalk)

That just makes me want to keep it for longer.

I disagree. In the position they are in where any alternative manager will just be surviving every year, it is a risk worth taking a potentially a great bit of business.

Davis not Davies, Adkins not Atkins etc

Once in six attempts. Poor.

Good to see derby lost too.

Coppell has a great championship record. Same cannot be said for Burley.

Which is a potentially cracking appointment for them. I hope not.

Sorry mate. Opted for the beanbag on groupon tonight. http://www.groupon.co.uk/deals/national-deal/infurn/1397956 Just unfortunate timing. All the best.

It was more to do with the fact that one of them has ms an so they were refused despite clearly demonstratin the ability to cope over a number of years and with that person having no relapses during that period. I do think it was a case of looking at the condition rather than the individual case. They got a young child and were obviously able to cope and gave them a much better childhood.

My parents adopted a child and found it very hard going. Almost not worth the effort though this was a good few years ago so things may have changed.

I see. Are you allowed to adopt with a criminal conviction? Anyone know?

Don't see why not, if he passes the required interviews and does things in the correct manner.

It's the internet. It isn't difficult.

Yes that is what I meant. It's working so it'll be out sooner rather than later.

OK well that makes sense. I imagine that already happens anyway.

I'm still struggling with what you're trying to say.

So what would you suggest? Anyone who displays a lack of judgement should have their children taken off them in the future for their own protection?

Did the judge think that? I genuinely don't know enough of the details.