hypochondriac

Is now Michael Wilde I believe.

Look forward to it.

Could have bought another :cool:

I presume you mean the time I made public the bloke inciting violence? I get PMs all the time from people on here and nobody knows a thing.

The fact you have never even given the fans an explanation is pretty pathetic. You were quite happy to pander to the fans on here when things looked good for you

I can't go because I already booked a thing away. Luckily I already bought my season ticket so I have made my financial contribution.

Just wanted an outline on what the meeting was like or why it was obstructed by people. PM is available if you would prefer it to remain private! I'm not anyone of importance, just a normal supporter .

I like this thread.

Wilde had the shares he could have done anything he wanted to. He CHOSE to support Lowe.

Mark what are your thoughts of the evening with regard to SISA?

If you come anywhere near SMS in the future then I fear for your safety and quite right too. W*nker.

Ting is a lot of his views are totally at odds to the majority of saints fans yet often he talks like the voice of the fans.

Pointy earlobes...

I love you Mark Fry xxx

Bristol City was pretty ****e. Their ground is ****e as well.

I would like to add Nick to that, especially if he wants to be the FOTB.

Look. They have had a chance to voice concerns or to start something for ages. Did they bother? No nothing. Then as soon as there is a chance that they could get fan ownership and FOTB back on the agenda they jump at the chance, even coercing people like derry who are doing their best for the club to try and make them all unite under the trust banner so that they look like they are representing everyone. Why not just have come on you reds banners around town? No it has to be come on you reds with a big saints Trust logo. Why not have this save our saints concert with the Trust working in the background? No it has to be "in assosciation with the Trust". In my opinion they just want the credit and kudos with a lot of what they do and that's sad because if they just worked in the background for the good of SFC then I would support them. If you want to be sarcastic and try to belittle the very real concerns that people have about the Trust then go ahead but I think most people can see that there are very real issues here and it's one of the reasons that most original members became disillusioned and left.

Why be ridiculous about it? They are very valid and legitimate concerns, especially if they are trying to get involved with running the club.

Derby for me. We played fantastically that day and was nice to get one over on them. Chants of "On the pitch!" were classic.

I don't speak for anyone else but personally I am annoyed that they continue to lie about the amount of members they represent and therefore make themselves sound more important than they are. I am irritated that they have stayed on the sidelines and organised quiz nights whilst the club was going under. It is only now that they decide to do something whilst Nick condemned the previous protests and seemed to imply that it was the fan's fault that we are where we are. I'm also irritated that Nick uses the Trust to voice his own opinions and it then translates to something that "The Trust" said (something that some people could take to mean the opinion of hundreds.) I've probably missed some out as well.

I see that all the time. It isn't Matty though, we went about 80 to catch up and see.

Well whatever but I'm not giving any money unless I am sure it will be used purely to help the club to continue to exist. I urge everyone else to do the same and all this talk of "influence" could potentially be damaging. I'm sick to death of all this and to be perfectly honest if the choice is to continue in league one with no money doing a whip round every year between the fans to keep us going and seeing continued decline or to go under and start again with a clean slate at the bottom I would chooe the latter every time.

Your plan is fine imo except the ambiguity of the influence statement. Just say I decide to give money to help the club and the saints trust use that money to get a fotb next year. Well I wouldn't be pleased because I totally oppose that. If I knew my money was going purely to help the club survive well that's a different story

So any money I donate could potentially fund the trust having a greater influence over the club? No thanks

Who is judging who is a decent individual and what sort of influence are they expecting