Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    43,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. The main problem is I can't see Davies getting involved. He has had plenty of opportunities in the past. No harm in asking though!
  2. Lol. Your posts say more than a reply from me ever could.
  3. A good intelligent post. I quite agree.
  4. Was all rather amusing at the time because no one listened to the various PR posters anyway.
  5. I expected some sort of plan or initiative (its why I PM'd Fitzhugh and Tim a couple of weeks back.) I'm just letting you or anyone else know that I'm not prepared for friggin ridiculous schemes like smoke bombs which is just as bad as beating up other fans.
  6. Peaceful protest is fine by me. I would never condone anything so ridiculous and daft as setting off smoke bombs. If that happened near me I would gladly report the person concerned to the OB.
  7. He will have to go if we get relegated. There would definitely be mass protest if he clung on after that. It would be impossible for him to stay.
  8. I think we will get relegated and go into admin. We will then get rid of Lowe and Wilde (no idea about Crouch.) Some will say that Lowe will pick us up after admin but I can't see it happening. We will then have a totally different team and will have to rebuild, probably with a different chairman. I think I will be happier then than I am now because at least the fans should be fully behind the team and fully supportive (whatever fans there are left!)
  9. You have a PM
  10. Been on here before. Still funny though.
  11. I'm up for that, assuming that enough turn up that is
  12. I believe he was the owner till he gave it to Tris? Something like that.
  13. Would rather be successful doing that. Pretty football has got us nowhere for 5 years.
  14. Stanley is Tristan and the ex admin/owner of foreversaints.com
  15. Fair point. Often I find that "smaller" clubs have a perception of "bigger" clubs fans before they have even met them. We were initially very arrogant but now I would say it is actually the opposite. We go into most games expecting to lose and I wouldn't accuse us of arrogance at all.
  16. I would prefer Boothroyd but he is my second choice.
  17. It's Tristan.
  18. We didn't act like that anyway. We never once said anything against Doncaster, it was purely against Lowe. You think supporters of another club would be sympathetic.
  19. Tony Adams is wearing a hideous tie.
  20. I've spoken to Steve about this in private and I won't be discussing it again on here. As I pointed out to him, my posts are far from perfect and in my opinion are often worse than Steve's, it's just that I feel his have declined markedly whereas mine have always been consistently poor! Anyway the matter is closed as far as I am concerned.
  21. Often it is not what you say Steve but how you say it. I was simply suggesting that many have taking exception to the patronising tone of a lot of your replies. Feel free to dismiss my comments as abuse but there was no malice involved. I am genuinely saddened that you have lowered yourself to be part (and often the ringleader) of the pettiness and oneupmanship. In no way am I suggesting that my posts are perfect at all but I really think you could do with thinking before you post a bit more sometimes. Obviously it is different at the moment when things have reached breaking point, but you have been this way for quite some time. Try not to react in a patronising or aggressive manner to other posters and you will almost certainly return to being a thoroughly interesting and informative poster. Feel free to take offence but if you do then you have missed the point somewhat.
  22. A) He wasn't in there for a free drink, he said that himself B) Of course he should be treated differently to you! Unless you are Mick Channon and I have didn't realise, in which case I apologise.
  23. See this is the problem. I really truly respected your views and what you had to say. I use to go on the view all posts button for you, franks cousin, weston, saintlee and even Keith back in the day. Its very sad that you have changed so drastically in the last six months (I mean look at the sarcasm in that reply!) Your arguments used to be very sound And I found myself nodding in agreement. As soon as Lowe came back you took every opportunity to have a pop both at Lowe and the people willing to give him a chance. You have sneered and looked down on people. At one point in about November it looked like this experiment may be working but all you did was say how deluded people were for believing in it and giving abuse to people that were willing to see how it panned out. The experiment has not worked but I can't see any pleasure in adopting your attitude from the outset. Now all you do is post derogatory remarks about other posters and moan about Lowe (not saying I disagree with a lot of those.) It's very sad and I imagine I'm not the only one who has begun to skip over a lot of what you have to say. The forum as a whole is a lot worse off for it.
  24. This forum is nowhere near as big as it used to be. It isn't even as busy as it was 18 months ago.
  25. And you are just as bad. In the past six months the standard of your posts have got ten times worse. They are horribly biased and often aggressive and sneering at others who don't believe the same things as you. I thought you were better than that.
×
×
  • Create New...