hypochondriac

And no one said otherwise but to pretend there isn't a specific problem within a subset of Islam that means Pakistani men are massively disproportionately represented in grooming gangs statistics is just weird. What possible reason would people have to try to cover this fact up? Look at the damage the denial has done. Thousands of girls raped and people would rather turn a blind eye lest they be accused of racism.

That would be true apart from the fact that I've never shown any examples of turning a blind eye to child abuse whereas soggy will not discuss Islamic Pakistani rape gangs or Islamic terrorism and the religious component to it without blaming the west in some way. For some reason the likes of you are literally incapable of discussing this specific issue without turning to whatabouttery.

The thing is that's literally what happened. The wilful blindness to the issue has meant that people with the same mindset as soggy are responsible for widespread sexual abuse and rape of young uk girls.

It's not such a laugh for the women subjected to it.

What it means is there are specific issues caused by fundamentalist Islam. It's not simply the evils of human nature. 84% of rape gangs cases in the UK are perpetrated by a demographic that makes up 2% of the total UK population. This is wildly disproportionate on an unprecedented scale. Testimony from the rape victims show that the rapists frequently quoted qaranic verse as justification for their evil and others in the community were aware of what was happening but did not act because these girls were viewed as lesser humans (and again qaranic verses were used for this explanation.) Similarly, we have seen a large number of Islamic terror attacks in recent years causing death and fear and again, islamists have pointed to qaranic verses which are explicit in their calls for violence. There are undoubtedly other terrorist attacks and paedophilia which is unrelated to fundamentalist religion but taken together there is undeniably a problem here and to turn a blind eye, to resolutely refuse to see it as a very specific cultural problem that involves the Islamic religion or to talk in general terms without addressing the specifics is essentially the attitude which has allowed these rape gangs to operate unchecked for decades. Your attitude is a big part of the problem.

Thank goodness we didn't loan out Adams to Leeds. Promotion far from certain for them now.

It's worse.

Normalised then. You know what I mean.

Yeah. Far easier to deal in broad sweeping generalisations about human nature than have to look into specifics or uncomfortable reasons.

I kind of get that. It should be normal for people to be gay, not so normal to live a lie for most of your life and hurting your wife and children in the process.

For sure. All I've ever wanted is for the club to spend loads of money on expensive but crap players because other clubs do. Behave.

Everything in the last leg is hideously unfunny.

He's one of the major figures in Christian history. Adolf- the great Christian uniter.

What gives you the authority to refer to parts of the qaran as misunderstandings?

Any response? Particularly as you seem so intent on comparing the two religions for some reason as if they can't be judged individually.

Told you.

Is religious doctrine a factor in Pakistani grooming gangs and Islamic terrorist attacks? Yes or no. (prediction: you won't answer.)

That criticism of Islamic scripture is just a perverted interpretation.

Yep that was my point. Just inventing things to make themselves stand out. The only other thing it could be is because bisexual is binary and they believe in the story about 5000 other genders.

Since when has part of being a bisexual been about making a definitive decision about when you want c*ck or m*nge on any given day?

So a slutty bisexual then.

Maverick was back in the day.

So you aren't fussed if it's men or women. That's just bisexual then.

It's a bit like that lib dem mp who is pansexual. Seems people are just inventing words now to make themselves seem special.

Surely if you think it's harmful and has a negative impact then by definition you are anti it?