hypochondriac

I generally have a very pessimistic view of the current leadership, but even I don't think that's what they have done.

I value diversity of thought. Without differences of opinion on here you'd just have the likes of soggy, verbal and moonraker huffing their own farts and circle jerking to guardian opinion pieces. If preventing that is considered attention seeking then I'm happy to be labelled one. I don't agree with many new left or far left opinions but I'm happy to accept that those opinions are sincerely held. It's depressing the amount of people who cannot say the same about libertarian, liberalist or centre right opinions which are branded as hate speech or neo nazi by the usual posters and thus can be dismissed out of hand. As aintforever said earlier, how unfortunate that some are so close minded and tribal that they cannot even enter into a conversation containing ideas they disagree with without attacking the other poster with false accusations of nazism or fascism or suggesting they support an assortment of far right personalities.

I did it because of the predictably hysterical reaction it would provoke from the type of people that spend their days perpetually screaming about imagined fascists. Some even reside on here. The irony that some are still bringing it up and referring to it after I changed it weeks ago is completely lost on them. Soggy and jonnyboy can't stop referring to it so it's obviously got under their skin. I'm quite happy to be called a bell end for annoying those types of posters. If they can't cope with a frog cartoon character without spouting off about fascism then they've obviously lived a very sheltered life and have very little self control.

I literally just said to my mate "watch soggy bring up the swastika" and you did! Hysterical! Change the record you are mind numbingly predictable.

I wonder what the reaction of corbynites would have been if Jezza had trotted off to meet dictator Kim. Really makes you think.

If it helps you, just assume that my use of pepe is in total agreement with Matt Furie who clearly wants it to be seen as politically neutral. Thankfully a frog picture can have a multitude of different meanings to loads of different people. I stand with the southern poverty law Centre who recognise that those who use a cartoon frog as a hate symbol are in the minority.

Your "support" of all of those people amounts to not referring to them as neo nazis or fascists. You have no understanding that there is a wide spectrum between support and calling someone a fascist. It's why all of your arguments lack any nuance and you're mostly a joke figure on here. Oh and I'm sure that your "wait and see" approach will turn into warm congratulations if this move does succeed in lowering tensions in the region? Of course you won't, you'd rather hack your own arm off than type anything positive about something that you feel doesn't fit your ideological position. Youre just as hopelessly biased as you believe others to be.

You realise we have variations of this thread virtually every summer? It will all be forgotten once the season starts again.

It's the gandhi frog that'd the real insidious one isn't it. You tell them jonnyboy, seek out the truth of that evil trump and his Legion of frog loving racists.

Then again, that trusted anti-hate group the Anti Defamation League has this to say on the matter: "The mere fact of posting a Pepe meme does not mean that someone is racist or white supremacist." "The majority of uses of Pepe the Frog have been, and continue to be, non-bigoted." It's odd jonnyboy that you'd consider the frog an alt-right symbol when such a respected Jewish organisation is saying it isn't. But then I wouldn't expect someone who refuses to condemn anti semitism to be too keen on agreeing with Jews...

Which picture of a frog is the alt right one? Is it the Hitler one? The stalin one? Or the jesus one? What hidden alt right white nationalist message are they spelling out Johnnyboy? It's your responsibility to inform the world.

Oh right post number 37 was actually an acknowledgement that trump has done something positive. I must have misunderstood because I assumed it was just some opportunity to praise Steptoe. Good stuff.

...

Ah I see so you claimed that I somehow condone far right violence by immediately bringing up far left violence as some sort of whattaboutery tactic in a similar way that jonnyboy does whenever someone brings up anti semitism in Labour. I dispute your statement- because it isn't true- you then change the subject to discuss the scale of violence on the right and left. You then say I'm "evading" because I signal no desire to veer way off topic to discuss violence rates on the right and left and after I've previously condemned all violence? Still no condemnation of anti semitism in the Labour Party by jonnyboy or any sort of recognition that reducing tensions in Korea is a good thing. Funny that.

Well that's a completely different question which involves a number of different definitions that I doubt we will agree over. I think what we both have now established though is that I haven't failed to condemn far right violence by immediately bringing up far left violence as you spuriously claimed.

Incorrect. I condemn far right violence, I also condemn far left violence. Not sure I've seen anything from jonnyboy condemning the 'pockets' of anti semitism from within the Labour Party.

...

Yep. Going to be used instead of flagging for offsides. Horrible idea.

Real shame about all the other stuff that let's him down #forthemanynotthejew

Yes assuming that all other nuclear nations follow suit. I assume you aren't seriously trying to equate America, France or the UK having nuclear weapons with the likes of North Korea? Morally there really isn't any comparison but yes I would prefer less nuclear weapons in the world in general. The likes of corbyn have been banging on about the evil capitalist pigs engaging with their enemies for ages. As an ardent supporter I assume you see this move as a positive thing?

Lol. Sorry mate but your support is making you a bit deluded. Any mls player would jump at the chance to play regularly in the strongest league in the world. I mean we signed lemina from juventus last year. Which club do you think has a greater attraction, atlanta or juve?

Oh yes. Suggesting his meeting with Kim Jong Un is a good thing amounts to "support" in your crazy world. There's no shades of grey in soggy land. Kim is an evil dictator, but if this meeting assists in securing less nuclear weapons in the world and less tensions on the Korean perninsula then I don't cere how it makes Trump look. Some people would prefer Trump had no sort of success at all simply because he is trump which just shows where their priorities lie. I can't understand a mindset that would prefer trump to fail in everything he does rather than hoping that he is successful because it would be a positive thing. No surprise that that's your mindset soggy because you'd prefer to feel smug and good about how morally superior you are compared to everyone else rather than achieve anything substantial.

Looks like trump has had a few major wins recently with the booming economy and now this historic summit with Kim Jong Un. Maybe he's not as appaling as some have made out?

I haven't watched the interview yet but I very much doubt there was more waffle and lack of substance than the things krueger has put out. I don't he dabbled in single digiting or all the other annoying Americanisms.

That's the one. Comes up like this: