Greenridge

Just so I know for future reference, which if these traits do you display? Thanks for your help.

I can't remember who it was but someone on here was, I guess, mischievously suggesting it was definitely a penalty. That was one of the true comedy moments on this forum.

Maybe it's getting lost in translation.

Lol are you a body-language expert as well now?

Strange that Ferdinand didn't get charged for his ironic clapping in the face of the Ref for the CL game last week. Still, that doesn't excuse our behaviour as long as it's consistent across the board.

From whom?

My bad, I get easily confused with who's being ironic and who's not!

I think you might want to re-read the post.........

It's strange that Turkish didn't give his carer, The Kraken, the same grief when he stated he was going to boycott SMS for the rest of this season due to the sacking of Nigel.

You're persistent I'll give you that.

I do recall The Kraken stating he would not be attending any more games at SMS this season as a way of personal protest agains the sacking of Adkins. I don't think he was one of the posters who had a go at the Corrie lookalike though.

You seem to be getting a little muddled Barry. You said 'they are screwed' now you are suggesting relegation is not a problem as their owner won't walk away but will use his own 'personal wealth' to bankroll them. That's OK then. This strategy appeared to work very well down the road.

Glad that we can finish this 'debate' at that point. Still, they gave it a go lol.

And what if they get relegated, you don't seem to allow for that in your argument? There are plenty of current examples of what happens if it doesn't work out. Other than Remy (whose worth is yet to be proven) I don't see huge potential for asset stripping and as for Redknapps claim that they would get more than they paid (and indeed had an offer) for Samba I'll put that in the same filing tray as his stories on banking.

Any ideas on timescales? This thread is about relegation for the 2012/13 season.

And after they've questioned those 'poor decisions' what happens next?

It's funny though. Isn't it?

So by your logic Kelvin shouldn't have been on the bench either. Makes sense I guess.

People who bump their own threads to prove a point clearly have some self-esteem issues. It goes on quite a bit on here. Of course the best of both world's would be nice, attractive football and the right results. I have a colleague who's a Stoke season ticket holder and they absolutely despise the way they play but just about accept it whilst grinding out results but they've be all over Pulis in recent weeks with their current run of results.

Couldn't even wait till the end of the game to hang, draw and quarter the latest scapegoat.

As mentioned 37 points would be a good return from our remaining fixtures. It's going to be tight, very tight. Slightly off tangent but I see old Bagpuss is already trying to distance himself from the financial concerns at QPR. It's never his fault. http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11711/8551355/QPR-will-not-face-financial-issues-if-they-go-down-says-Harry-Redknapp

Yes, that's twice you've posted after me today. I agree, very weird.

It's all got a little embarassing for ickle Richie, don't make it any worse for him.

He's trying to be 'funny'. Little Richard instructed him to.

You're a bit late Richie, one of your gang has already inanely bored the thread several times with that line already.