Clapham Saint

Yes but I think you're missing the point. Go back (say) 100 years. If it had been possible to make a similar website then (obviuosly not but keep with it...) the information contained would just be a 10th of that included today. Without researching I'd guess that they could have got to the point where they had a "guess" at teh size of the planets" and atoms were likely the smallest possible particels. Imagine if in another 100 years time a similar site were drawn up and what we currently know made up just a 10th of it...

We were in block 42 ( I think - 2 over from the skates anyway) and were doing the same...

One Peter Storrie, There's only one Peter Storrie

Or... If you are paying 98% tax then the financial return that is required from an investment (especially a risky one) in order for it to be worth while is HUGE and as a result many projects simply don't go ahead. With a lower tax rate more projects become viable and so more is invested, generating profits, which are then taxed, jobs, which are then taxed etc etc.

I suspect some people are away for easter and so can't make the p*mpey game.

So you deliberately set out to defraud HMRC?

Really? St George's Hill? And isn't this thread just taking the Paul Allen's yacht thing a bit far... Theo Paphitis' car does't quite have the same ring to it.

There's only one Peter Storie

"...while Town pulled out of deals for keeper Stephen Henderson and the versatile Joel Ward at the 11th hour after baulking at the duo’s wage demands." Now this can't be right. We had it on good authority that the players had turned down moves away becuase they loved P*mpey and were "all in it together".

Funniest bit of that is on about 40 secs... "Come on P... oh' er what is it again.... Come on P*mpeyyyyyyy....."

As with the last few series they look like a bunch of tvvats that nobody in their right mind would employ...

If we differentiate between "Secular Marriage" and "Church Marriage" for a moment… I don’t see any reason why gay people shouldn’t be allowed to get married (Secular Marriage). If that is what they want to do when why shouldn’t they be allowed to? My understanding is that the proposal is that they should be able to do so and I am in favour. As far as Church Marriage is concerned, I believe that gay people should also be able to get married in a religious ceremony; however, if it is a religious service then it really is ultimately down to the church to decide. If the church choose not to allow it then although I disagree with them it is their call. By not allowing gay marriage I expect the church achieve very little other than to highlight how out of touch it is with the modern world and continue its drift into irrelevance.

I think (think), he is referring to £30m repaid to banks and £30m of losses = £60m repaid to banks.If he considers trading losses to be "money called in by the bank" and not something which should have been addressed by the management team then then I would suggest this might go some way to explaining the financial issues suffered by all the clubs he has been involved with.

Just to be seen to be trying? If a deal falls apart he can then try and pin it on TB? Maybe. Or maybe he's genuine.

I was in the telephone que for an hour this morning. Thank god it's an 0800 number! Tickets booked in block 41, row R. Bring it!!!

I wonder how the Brum fans feel about that quote. No metion of wanting to play for Brimingham at all other than an inferred side effect of doing well for P*mpey.

I just hope get the oportunity to play them again this season. After that... I really don't care.

Based purely on the choice of words in the administrators' statement... "Assignmnet" would mean that they had signed over the legal entitlement to the parachute money to gaydamack (sp?). However if this was the case and the parachute payments had been assigned to gaydamack, why was he included in the CVA? It also seems a little strange that the PL / FL would let them assign the payment to somebody else...

F***ing nuts!!! Lol

l o l

I think that Friday's events were the best thing that could have happened for the phew. They should now either i) get a new owner, hopefully with no ties to the old regieme or ii) be closed down and liquidated, no doubt with a new club starting in the lower leagues. If they do get a new owner I wouldn't be suprised if further points deductions follow as a new buyer would probably still need to invest more than the club is worth to be able to get a CVA agreed. You never know though I guess If they do start in the lower leagues at least they will have a clean slate.

No ......

Given that he is the administrator of csi and has never had a formal appointment over the current company, my first question would be to as why he has had the best interests of the club in mind and not the best interests of csi's creditors...

The administrator doesn't have to pay the cva. The sale of the club to a new company means that the new company just have a liability to the old one which is equivalent to the cva payments. As of yesterday the new co is protected from all creditors which already existed prior to the administration order - including the balance due to the old company. The football league might take a different view when considering points deductions but the administrator won't be paying anything towards the cva (now a liquidation of old co).