egg

Yep. No credible options so take a pop. Sign of frustration.

This. We're missing a CF, but, any competent manager should be able to coach, organise, and motivate this group of players to be competing at the top end of this league. Not losing at home to fecking Preston. Absolute shambles.

Yep. Or Aribo up top and AA off the right. Either way, a 4231 or 433.

There were 2. Easy to spot - they had a ? after some words.

Swing

Gloss

Spitting Image have done well: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/15jWEBq9n1/?mibextid=wwXIfr

The jury got it right, as did the Judge when directing them. Not sure the CPS did though, daft charge. They're still idiots though, and driving there, bless em.

That's lovely to hear Whitey. Congratulations to you all.

I hadn't appreciated that, but I'm not surprised. To be fair, my focus has always been on daft privatisations and sell offs which have cost us (and still do), but she did well re Europe.

But those people are obnoxious, and have disagreeable views. It's not always that way - I admired Thatcher as a person, she carried herself with grace, but I despised her politics and policies.

I don't think they stand a chance with Badenoch. Not terribly bright, and just unlikeable.

He's a good bloke and I'm surprised he ever got tied up them. Credit to him, and others, for realising their error.

That'll boost the high street, and get some good quality protein into the masses. You've saved the nation.

Perhaps they were racists or nonces escaping to somewhere where they're safer and more accepted.

Nice. Very succinct. Evicted, title stripped, all but acknowledges that he's a nonce, and sends the right message to the poor girls family.

Spies

Crazy that people would turn their noses up at Awoniyi, not that he'd drop to our level anyway.

Is that something you've been told, or concluded?

I think we've spent ages getting nowhere. Ultimately, we're not ditching our HRA, our existing UK case law remains regardless of what happens re ECHR, and foreign law will still be out there. This boils down to people having the belief that European law cuts off the autonomy of our legal system and judicial independence. I also think people calling for our removal from the EHCR have no idea that we have the HRA which ain't going anywhere.

I get that you want to cut off appeals at SC level. I have no issue with that as long as we have domestic law akin to what we have now. What changes do you seek to the HRA if we no longer have an appeal route to Europe? Regardless, existing domestic case law will still have a place. Foreign law will also still be persuasive as Farmer has said.

This is pointless. The HRA is domestic. The case law from it is domestic. What you seem to be getting at, I think, is keeping the HRA but exiting the EHCR. In reality, that'll make no meaningful difference on the ground.

I gather it's quite liberal round there. Any decent barmaids in the local?

I'm not sure where you're doing your research mate, but you have this mistaken belief that there's a plethora of European law which binds our judges. There isn't. I still want to know what part of our HRA you want to replace/get rid of.

I can't get on board with the lawyers point. The lawyers argue the law, nothing more, and people need access to justice, even with a shit case. The Tribunal system hears far more cases for social entitlement and send than it does for immigration and asylum. The resources aren't there to hear more, and that needs addressing urgently.