egg

Bless you. Nobody is crying on here. Sadly some people will be hit very hard by this. You clearly don't get that income doesn't always equate to disposable income.

So happy to preach on for cuts to be made but will take tax out of the system.

Why not now? If you feel there's an acceptable threshold to lose one well established, non means tested state payment, you presumably feel that there is an acceptable threshold to lose another?

It's a long established non means tested benefit. Should we take the state pension away from those with decent pensions?

Adjust your mortgage? Your number of kids? Your 3 year loan? Your 3 year car finance?

What DPS said.

Lovely (albeit ridiculous) rant but it avoids the question. It is greedy to ask for something that you don't need. It is not "greedy" or "pathetic" or "sick" to feel unhappy that something that always has been given is taken away. I would imagine that many families with one earner just over £50k will be hit very hard by this. Some will have large mortgages, various children, only one earner, debts and so on.

I was referring to the "ingrained greed" commebt. Which side of the argument are you referring to?

Why is it greed to feel agrieved to lose something that you've always had? Particularly at a time when income is not keeping pace with cost of living.

Yes. Makes the point above look a bit silly.

How does that make him more valuable?

Erm, but Cody be our future number one? I'll get my coat.

Seems a very good price for diagnosis, part and labour. Result.

Agreed. I was there a couple of weeks ago, and it had gone downhill bigtime. Premier inn, holiday inn and jurys inn so much better. I'd even prefer to stay in the etap or ibis tbh. As for the night out, platform tavern and oxford street is as good as it gets.

This sounds plausible. You can't sign players in the modern game without making agents rich. It would be interesting to see the fees paid to agents by the clubs that have done business with us.

Agreed. Sadly, I think he'll get battered inside two. I hope I'm wrong.

Agreed. Sadly, I think he'll get battered inside two. I hope I'm wrong.

Please don't be fooled by "its only a sensor". That sensor could be a crankshaft sensor. Mine failed causing the car to completely cut of on the outside lane of the M271. You get a warning late, pay someone £25 and find out what exactly it is.

To answer the original question, no. We are far from established in the prem. If we go down, the young players who have had a chance in the bigtime may want to leave. It will be difficult to keep them. If we stay up, ambitious players could well have their heads turned by the big boys. Money and agents are big influences. Our current position assists, but players and bigger clubs usually get what they want.

Wrong on two counts. 1. Shaw has played in a sIde with two holding CM's giving protection to the whole back 4 inc the full backs. Lallana has less defensive responsibility in the new set up but nonetheless appears to be doing more. 2. Are you seriously saying that lallana has been doubling up as left back? He rarely covered Fox in that position, and certainly didn't fill in there.

Number 3. The others you list are factors too but our shape is the main factor imo. Two proper holding midfielders are now protecting the whole 4. They create a platform for the attacking quartet to do there thing.

Try Pittstop in Shirley. £25 for diagnostics and very fair for repair costs. Fault could be anything tbh. Get the diagnosis and take it from there.

Spot on. It's not just punch though, we really are playing with a front quartet who are all firing and have real synergy. Punch has always had real ability. He was a player who was unhappy playing below his level. That was unfortunate but to an extent understandable.

The definition of a hired gun, so yes.

Very much a bloke mate. Just reporting 20 years experience on the ground over about 3000 cases acting for husbands and wives.