egg

Not everyday for months, no.

Amen to all of that.

Warrant

Watching

That's nonsense. The starting point is the status quo, and that prevails until there's evidence to the contrary. She is and has been recognised as a woman. Thus, until it's proven that she isn't a woman, she's entitled to be treated and termed as such. The IOC have done exactly that. Whether she should compete with her natural advantage is a separate discussion. However, such advantage does not render her a man and entitle people like you to misgender her and refuse even to respect that she's entitled to be addressed as she - thoroughly disrespectful of you to be unwilling to do that. You have provided zero evidence. None. You've rejected invitation upon invitation to provide links to your evidence. Instead, you've mentioned that this lady has XY chromosomes. That much is already known. The presence of those chromosomes do not make her a man, and there's no evidence that she is a man - that's your belief/hope/opinion. And yep, it is vastly more complicated than you thinking that she's a bloke, so she must be. If science and testing reveals that on balance she's a man, then so be it, but until then the presumption is that she's what she's always been. That's indisputable. And as difficult as it is for this woman's opponents, the spotlight upon her must appalling, and things can't be helped by knowing that there's loads of keyboard warriors trying to re-asign her gender.

Push them towards the sea with water cannons would be a start. Feral people need feral treatment.

The idiots are at it in Rotherham today. Shouting "get them out" towards a hotel housing asylum seekers, throwing bottles and starting fires. They've gotta stamp down hard on this sharpish or it's going to get ridiculously out of control.

Questionable

FFS. You're as boring as you are bigoted. I don't need evidence for anything. She's born a woman. Recognised as a woman. Has competed as a woman. It's dinlo's like you trying to prove from behind a keyboard that a woman with female genitalia is a bloke who need to prove their argument. I'm still waiting for the links to your evidence that she's a man.

That doesn't help one bit, but it doesn't alter the fact that women born and recognised as women, albeit afflicted with swyer syndrome, are not men.

The chromosome thing has been known for ages. It seems to be the thing that bigots like Hypo hang on to while overlooking the very minor details of being born with female genitalia, registered at birth as female, being raised a female, and actually being a female.

Final request - links to EVIDENCE please. I repeat, what you believe and/or claim to have read is not evidence. You're a tryer Hypo, I'll give you that, but you've got a shit argument, and you can't prove it. Bless you.

Your inability to put up links to support your opinion tells it's own story. Your a bigot mate, pure and simple. I'm off out. I'll check back for links to evidence later.

Ha!! Of course you didn't. If you're as well versed on this topic as you claim (you're not, you just have a bigoted opinion) you'll have noted that if she wanted to trans to a man, she couldn't because of the laws in her country and her religion. You've gotta read actual facts Hypo, you'll learn stuff.

A) That's not an answer. What's an adult female human in your view? Tits/fanny? Innards? Hormones? Chromosomes? B) You haven't. You have an opinion. That's not evidence. If you believe there's evidence (other bigots views on X and Reddit ain't evidence btw) you'll be able to link to it. Alternatively, you could be honest and just say that there's no evidence...chop chop.

Links to evidence please Hypo? Your phobic based opinion that she's a bloke ain't evidence.

I don't think Alcaraz has as much to offer at the top level as people think. He's wasteful with the ball and just not quite at the level for me. I don't see a huge market for him and I suspect he'll see the season out t here, playing a bit here and there. KWP is great, but ask yourself where he'd go in the PL and play regularly. Beyond West Ham I don't see where. I think he'll go abroad. As for ABK, I'm not sure who'd give us money for him. If he goes, it'll surely be a loan.

Any chance of links to your evidence that she's a bloke please?

They still gather on the bridge at Camden so there's still time mate.

That one stood out to me. That said, none of the actions of these idiots makes any sense, so I suspect as much thought went into torching the library as the shoe shop.

Family

Trousers isn't either of those things. Hope that helps. Who's lost an argument? The boxer lady is a lady. She isn't a bloke cos hypo says so.

It's a question of science and fact, not opinion. That said, I'm not trying to change Hypo's view, and I haven't asked him to. Rather, I don't understand: a) what he defines a woman as (he's asked others to, do entirely reasonable that he does); and b) how he's so convinced that this woman is a bloke. Re a) He's asked others to define a woman but doesn't himself. Re b) He's been asked to link to evidence to support his assertion. These are his points, not mine. He needs to put up or shut up imo.

No tantrum from me poppet. I just think your moral compass points in the direction or transphobic/islamaphobic/hypocritical cunt, and I don't mind pointing it out. Anyway, enjoy your day spent trying to convince yourself and a few strangers that a woman is a bloke. Feck knows why you would, but each to their own.

Links to evidence that this woman is a proven man please. Thank you. Your posts suggest to me that you are transphobic and islamaphobic. I'm entitled to that opinion. You label others as all sorts - don't whine when you get a bit back.