egg

Your posting history is up there and elsewhere mate. I'm allowed my opinion of you, and whilst I appreciate that dents your ego, but that's my opinion. On topic. Are you ready to denounce what the Israeli regime are doing in Gaza, or the West Bank, or did yesterday in Qatar? It's a yes or no.

Whether she is or she isn't makes no odds to me, bizarre that you feel that it would. On topic, your attitude towards the behaviour of the Israeli regime yesterday and over the recent past, is at odds with that of decent people. If your wife or father or in law is Muslim, it feels odd to me that you have so little compassion for the wanton killing of Muslims by the Israeli regime. Regardless of your wife's religion, I regard you as a bit of a cunt on this issue.

Behave. Everything I know or understand about posters is based entirely on what they've posted. Don't flatter yourself that I give a monkeys about who or what you are in the real world. If you haven't said or implied that your missus is Muslim, then I'm a Viking called Erik.

Indeed. The impression has been given of having a Muslim wife and in-laws. Very odd to now suggest otherwise.

No coincidence of the timing after the Qatar incident. "If they can smash up a Qatari buildings, what's wrong with us having a little mooch about in the sky".

The commitment and humour of football fans. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DK8FDwQzI3a/?igsh=NnRvZDBueG05YjR0 Brilliant.

This will likely be a "malfunction" of the control system or some such and all but be forgotten by Trump tomorrow. Whilst unconnected, when Israel can get away with literal murder in other sovereign nations, it's not surprising that Russia will test the boundaries.

Ha! You joined a chorus of people branding SoG as anti semitic, which he isn't, but your attitudes to the deaths of Muslims is appalling. To crown it, you mock him for highlighting his non white acquaintances, whereas your persona sometimes claims to have a Muslim wife. Glasshouses/stones.

We don't operate the catering side, so we don't make make or lose money as such. That said, whether the external company are paid a fee to cover these games which may be a loss leader for them, we won't know. Ticket costs were a tenner and three quid for kids. If we assume half were adults, that's £26k in ticket sales. Operational costs are more than a few salaried staff, none of whom would normally be working. I think it very likely that cleaning staff, grounds people, security, and all other operational staff are being paid extra for the shift. Our friends at chat CPT estimate a total of £30-40k per match operational costs. £26 minus £30-40k = a loss.

Julian

It's taken a while to click, but blimey, it did tonight.

You've shown yourself to be an inhumane cunt during this "war" mate. There's universal outrage amongst normal thinking people about what's going in Gaza, and what's happened in Qatar, for good reason.

Even Trump is talking more sense than you over the Qatar bombing, acknowledging that it doesn't advance either US or Israeli interests. Or to put it another way, that it was a stupid idea.

How have we gone from people voting in the knowledge that their tax bill won't go down (and will probably go up) to the ridiculous idea of popping an unsolicited cheque in the post to HMRC?! For feck sake.

Dennis is proper proud of taking that coin to the head and getting on with it. That long throw leading Moran's goal is pretty much an assist imo. Hero.

You're making less sense as the day goes on mate.

Nobody "wants" to, or has said that they do. Rather, some people accept that paying less has a knock on impact that they're not comfortable with, and that paying more should achieve the opposite.

That's a daft hypothetical. I don't vote with my bank balance in mind, and I'm comfortable that my vote is always in favour of a taxing party. If I voted for a party with the primary intention of keeping more cash in my pocket, regardless of the impact on society (less necessary spending for example), then my outlook is selfish (and greedy). I get that you don't see that, and that's because are politics and outlooks are at opposite poles. I'm not getting into a strike debate. CBA.

Alas many wealthy people are selfish. Not all though, fortunately.

Seems a strange punt to me. He's got minimal chance of getting past an injury free Pope, and zero chance of getting near England sitting on a bench. He'd have had some chance of getting in if he'd played for us, albeit someone above him will have needed to fall out of form or become unavailable. He'd definitely have had more chance playing for anyone in the prem. Just seems a really odd move to me.

"Individual priorities" is an interesting phrase. I interpret that to mean an individual willingness to pay tax, which flows from our political leanings. Left leaning folk are more willing to pay tax and spend (sensibly) for the benefit of all, whereas right leaning folk want to pay as little as possible, often without much concern for all. Circling that back to "priorities", I spose it's whether we prioritise ourselves or society.

I think Aribo offers us something that'll help. Edozie has never convinced me, but he'll do a job if needed. Although the squad is still too bloated, having these lads around until January is no bad thing.

The fact that we're discussing it suggests that it has done something.

Indeed. For many it was a dual protest. Protesting specifically against the proscription of PA isn't possible.

Thanks for the condescending instructions on how to speak with someone mate, much appreciated.