egg

Ha!! It's all good wholesome stuff. Add in doing someone else a good turn and not telling anyone, and that's a reasonably solid platform.

Trump yesterday. Is he wrong? 'Trump also claimed that illegal migration was an "invasion" which was "killing Europe". He said: "Last month, we (the United States) had nobody entering our country. Nobody. Shut it down. And we took out a lot of bad people that got there with (former US president Joe) Biden. "Biden was a total stiff, and what he allowed to happen.... but you're allowing it to happen to your countries, and you've got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe; many countries in Europe. "Some people, some leaders, have not let it happen, and they're not getting the proper credit they should. "I could name them to you right now, but I'm not going to embarrass the other ones. "But stop: this immigration is killing Europe."'

Yep. Sadly the number of kids looking like that will increase daily. Enough is more than enough.

Nice idea. I'm going for a link of two crap players. Tadanari Lee (Todd).

Is this intended as irony?

Hmm. I'm not sure that you can never again complain when SoG posts about posters rather than the subject. Unnecessary.

Good players, but I'm sticking with Kevin Keegan. One of the best players to wear the shirt, and hands down our biggest signing.

Jesus wept. That's a stretch of a stretch. Of course the mess isn't all on Maggy, but the origins were right to buy/lack of replacement stock/provision for a growing population.

It's a tad ridiculous to blame a government who've had a year of shit mopping up for the social housing situation. Even her biggest fans would have to concede that the issue began with Thatcher allowing the sale of stock and not replacing it. I suspect Labour would love to be able to knock up large housing estates like we saw back in the day, but we're skint and that's not happening.

Where do you get £14 per hour from? Regardless, they did a deal a last year and were happy with it so the issue can only be about the appropriate year on year raise. There needs to be a deal asap. I've got a mate who's in a senior role at a large local hospital. They're in the shit financially, and managed to save £250k to help them out of a hole. Covering the strikes wipes out those savings. There's no sympathy for them amongst the consultants, and hopefully the public too.

Gerry Forrest Nathan Redmond John Beresford James Bree Yan Valery Wayne Thomas And the legend that never was, Jay Lucas.

Kevin Keegan

Yep. Especially as Caroline was an 11 year old. Horrible song.

Yep. Nothing to add to that. An amazing musician, and seemed to be a lovely bloke. RIP.

3 years feels ott, but none of us know the terms. He may be on very little, or a reducing amount in the 3rd year. If we go up, his role next year will be minimal you'd imagine, and assuming we go back down, we'll have an experienced championship level CB to use if he's needed.

Cheers for the recommendation, we're really enjoying it.

No, and I'm struggling to understand why anyone would even think to. I agree with your last sentence though.

I haven't commented on the labour party motives . Or that of the leadership. I said that anyone who sees anything different in her actual words to the actual words is looking for something.

Many of us would swallow that, and would expect those who could/should to do so.

Disagree entirely. He needs to play, and in a decent league. He won't get regular minutes at many PL teams, unless he fancies likely relegation, and a move again next summer. The Turkish move would represent a step back in football terms, and I don't share your view that being the English bloke in a Turkish team is a positive life choice.

Feels like a good move for him. Should get regular minutes, and minimal risk of relegation. Good luck to him.

As I said, too much of a fixation on him, and all judged on him at PL level in a shit team under shit management. If he's a disaster this season feels free to tell me I got it wrong, but I'm pretty confident he'll be fine.

Again you misinterpret and conflate. Also she did not say that Jews and Muslims have not suffered racism all their lives. She actually said that racism comes in different forms, some based on first appearances. I doubt anyone seriously disputes that. Additionally - and it was clearly an additional point - she said that some people suffer prejudice because of physical characteristics, but not a lifetime of racism. My missus is a redhead, and on any assessment she won't have suffered racism, or a level of prejudice endured by black people, Jews, travellers (the people that Abbott actually mentioned). Again, I'd be staggered of anyone seriously disputes that.

I was commenting on the comments which led to her losing the whip petal.

Shortage