S-Clarke

This is hilarious actually. Slovakia have gone mentally, you can tell. Their body language is shot. Put them to the sword now. Feels a bit harsh as they did it all correctly for 95 mins. Football is such an odd game at times.

Jesus, how undeserved was that! Slovakia will be devested by that, they've done everything right. Great finish by Bellingham, but christ alive that is so unjust on football as a whole.

When Slovakia have the ball they look so much better than us. Still no changes.

First change was a forced one due to an injury, think that says all you need to know really.

How on hell have we not made any changes yet!! It's not fricking working, it hasn't all year!

He's made no changes. What is he waiting for? Bloke is a fucking wimp. He better hold back in Germany for a while after this, he will be less popular than Sunak. Good for Sunak I guess.

Lee Carsley lined up for his replacement apparently, the FA have a hard-on for promoting from within. Not sure anything changes even if Southgate goes.

The worst of the bunch from this tournament. I honestly don't think any changes fix this, the entire team and squad is disjointed and unbalanced. The coaching is utterly horrific. No tactical understanding of the modern game from any of them. They can throw on Palmer and Gordon, but if they follow the same horrendous coaching instruction then it's just pointless. Every single game we've played this entire calendar year has been absolutley inept. It's all broken quite deep and 'tweaks' in a single game at HT aint fixing this rabble.

If only we had Kalvin Phillips.

Absolutley deserved, should have been ahead by now. The England team is just not there, there's no fixing this. Kinda want them to put us out of our misery so I can enjoy the rest of the tournament.

I think Trippier is done at the top level, I include Newcastle in that too. Should have picked someone like Chilwell for this tournament.

Not as clear cut as that, books being fluffed again - it's basically a player swap deal, but on the books it looks as if both clubs have pocketed a decent sum on pure profit for a homeegrown.

So someone like Szmodics? I wouldn't include Crysensio Summerville as he's already beyond us price wise for this window. Szmodics could be attainable.

But at that point, you just have to ask what is attainable for us? We're not in a position to buy proven PL strikers, we probably never will be (that's why I wouldn't turn my nose up at Ings). Our best bet is taking a gamble on a young player from abroad, taking a gamble on a young player from this country, or taking a gamble on experience who is someone on their way down rather than up. All transfers are a gamble, but when you have $$$ you can have a safer gamble on someone like Haaland, Isak, Solanke etc - we don't have that, so we have to be much cuter. I wouldn't turn my nose up to either Ings or Delap as options on both ends of that spectrum.

I see what you mean, but yeah that's where we are at now. The 10-15m Mane's, Tadic's, VVD's we found in 2014/15 now start at around £30m. By all accounts the resale value on them will be much higher, but that's where the market has gone. If we're not able or prepared to enter that £30m market then we'll never be able to compete. I guess we are still a bit fearful given our clusterfuck Sulemana £22m signing, but that just boils down to utter shit scouting. We need to play in that £30m market once we're properly back and established (i.e. survive this year), otherwise it's pointless even being here.

All clubs have this cycle though. We had a golden period of our own when we were selling for profit, reinvesting, and then selling that for a profit etc. What Brighton are doing well at the moment will hit the stoppers at some point, it's absolutley inevitable. The fat lady started signing as soon as they lauded around the media about their profits last season. They're still light years ahead of us, but they'll be coming down a peg or two rather quickly in the next few years once their recruitment success starts drying up. (it's already started to)

The only way that happens is if Morgan Gibbs White moves in the other direction (Newcastle have been linked with him tbf). It'll be cost neutral at that point. Forest cannot spend a penny without sales.

So I guess he doesn't include Man Utd in that, given that they finished 8th last season. It's quite a scary league to be in these days, I would say most of it is already factored to the advantage of the Big 6 as it stands - Villa will have their wrists slapped very heavily by PSR if they attempt to compete again next year.

You speak as if you know the finances though and that we're in a difficult position whatever the situation. I just threw the question back at you to ask why you feel so sure that we are in a financially tricky position? I don't think it's as black and white as that at all. PSR will dictate how we operate and that's why we're seeing freebies and nothing major. If we could spend and weren't governed by these rules we would spend a decent chunk, I'm sure. We can still get good value from free's though, get ourselves safe and then go again properly next with with less financial red-tape around us.

And just to throw this back at you, how do you know the club are financially strapped? You've been saying this for months, if we didn't get promoted we'd be ruined financially, and now we're promoted we're still ruined financially. Not sure I totally buy it. PSR is what's making it look like clubs are skint, but we do probably have more resources than we did the last time we came up. We just can't use them.

Yep, they're offering out Isak and Gordon at the moment - no real takers at the fees they want, so they may be forced to accept low ball figures just to get them over the line. The football bodies need to have a real look at what a mess this PSR thing is creating to realise it's unsustainable. Clubs running scared everywhere, it's doing the opposite of what they intend it to do ''create an even playing field''

Just saw that myself. I know it's only the Irish league, but to be playing and impacting first team football @ 16 is pretty special, in whatever league. Beat some big clubs to this one. Hope we actually get to see him play for us before the inevitable transfer in a few years.

This is the part I take issue with - this should have been about admitting a mistake and replacing Bazunu with a long-term decent starting GK, keep Bazunu around and have a situation where he'd have to really, really fight for his place when he's fit. All we've done is basically nothing, which means Bazunu will be back automatically without having to fight for a place whenever he is deemed fit enough. I'd say 90% of fans wouldn't have taken this approach, so the guy who heads the GK department at the club has had a total brain fart if he feels this is a suitable way of going about this. Obviously this is all fixed if the club sign another GK...!

He's almost certainly on our list, we were heavily linked a couple of summers ago - but for crazy money, 20-25m I think. £10m would be a much fairer reflection. Like others have said, I think he has something about him. As a youth player he was prolific, everyone was excited about him and he was linkend to Kane in many ways. Defo a gamble at £10m I'd be happy to take (or a loan with a view)

Just putting it out there, but a young 20 year old Harry Kane was relatively similar before he made his proper break through - couple of nondescript champ loans at Norwich and Leicester where he did pretty similar to Delap, nothing mind blowing. We were linked with him in 2014 and I remember a lot of fans saying exactly the same ''Hasn't done anything, he's not going to do it at this level etc''. The rest was history once he got his chance at Spurs. Saints eye £10m Kane – The Sun