Lord Duckhunter

God, you must lead a boring life.

We’ve beaten City (as did Norwich) in a bit of a freak game, but did play well. We’ve beaten Norwich, who are woeful & Watford who are slightly better, but still poor. We couldn’t beat arsenal or Everton. Some people need to calm down.

Lol. Soggy, what world are you in if you can’t see anything wrong with it. If a black person merits being on the call, he’ll be on the call. Im thinking of setting up a recruitment agency ‘Blacks for hire’ . Businesses that want to feel good about themselves can hire one of my guys to sit in on calls, take part in photo opportunities and generally hang around being black. Soft arses like Soggy would love it, and they would only have to pay minimum wage, plus my mark up. I may even extend my books to include disabled, lesbos and even Trans folk. It’s a great business model because lefties will never look beyond someone’s skin colour, so I’ll always have a captive market.

What does that make Leicester, Utd & Chelsea. A top,top,top team? We’re nowhere near a top top team, it’s scary you think we are.

I understand why the clear and obvious interpretation is put in, because they don’t want the game re refereed by VAR. It’s a bit like umpires call in cricket. However, why the VAR can’t just advise the ref to re watch it on pitch side TV is beyond me. The ref is still making the ultimate decision and still in charge.

It’s not the wording that’s the issue. Clear and obvious, is just that, clear and obvious. It couldn’t be much clearer. If the VAR thinks a clear error was made, that was obvious to everyone, he should over rule (or ask ref to look again). If the idiot doing the VAR doesn’t think it’s that, there’s not a lot you can do.

Played well first half, Ok second as a Everton stepped up a bit. Looked like Redmond, JWP & Bertrand need a rest. Walker-Peters excellent again, Ings class as usual, Armstrong played well but his lack of real quality occasionally lets him down.

It means clear and obvious errors will be overturned.

Only 15 mentions of the 0-9 so far.

Reminds me of Dell boy when facing a question on The Gold Rush quiz Show. Q: “What state was jfk in when he was shot”. A: “A hell of a state “.

I see the fine people of Poole have Lord Baden-Powell back. The crusties seem to have lost this one. I’ll be down the quay sat night, so I’ll have a look and see if any patriots are guarding it.

Then it’ll be like a bloody dress. Modern kits are slim fit, particularly UA . I’m just a normal middle aged bloke, bit of a belly. XL, my normal size would be skin tight (not a pretty sight). They need a Gammon range.

You’re letting your dislike cloud your judgement. Klopp was class towards Ings when he left & this is pretty decent of him as well. He obviously likes the guy, and doesn’t want an injury to affect his immediate future.

What a load of pony. It wasn’t even him who passed the ball back to McCarthy, and he was ‘caught out’ because of a woeful pass from Hojberg.

That’s it, sound off. She’s just said that David Moyes has “worked wonders at West Ham”.

I know they’ve got another channel without the piped in crowd noise, but they really need one for alternative commentary. The bird doing the analysis for West Ham v Burnley is fucking annoying. Horrific voice, every cliche under the sun and clearly out of her depth. Wonder who she had to blow to get that gig, because merit clearly didn’t come into it. Woeful. Like an excitable 14 year old that’s won a competition.

Like the home kit a lot. Would buy it if it wasn’t for the fact they’re so tight. Why are modern kits so figure hugging, the need a fat bastards version.

Yes, the lack of alternatives.

You’re praising Japan, but they asked people to stay at home on April 7th, so that’s later than our lockdown. Yet you moan our lockdown was too late. From that, it looks like you’re just picking fault in Boris for the sake of it.

I’ve been the one arguing our lockdown was disproportionate, and getting lots of stick for it. I presume from your answer that you also think we over reacted. Or are you just criticising Boris for the sake of it.

Didn’t Japan have a far far milder lockdown than us? According to the BBC they kept their borders open far longer than other countries, only tested 0.27% of the population, didn’t legislate to close non essential shops . In fact used a far limited, yet more targeted approach, as compared to our panicked lockdown. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ordered a - non-enforceable - state of emergency on 7 April, asking people to stay at home "if possible". Can you imagine the bed wetting had Boris done the same in April.

Locking down the economy so drastically will cause people to die. You don’t need to prove that to the lefties, they’ve been telling us for years that poverty, unemployment & recessions kill people. Shutting down the nhs will kill people as early diagnosis has been proven to to save people’s lives. Chucking old folks out to free up beds undoubtedly killed people, but that policy was a result of flawed modelling from scientists and a panic that the NHS would not cope. The key questions is what drove government policy and would another government have acted differently. As a Labour government would have been following the same advice, dealing with the same NHS ,the same PHE, and seem to have wanted a harder lockdown or at least a similar one. I fail to see how it would have made much difference either way. When it comes to public health, they’re both pretty much the same despite pretending they’re not.

Ha ha ha ha

Brilliant he went the same way every time. Luckily one of the fishy twats lacked the brains to realise.