Lord Duckhunter

How does anything we do or say on here help Saints stay up? If you can only contribute if your contribution helps Saints stay up, it’ll be a pretty boring forum. In fact it’d be an empty forum. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You’ve lost the plot mate. “Tommy Robinson speech book” lol. I’m not the one getting targeted by extremists, the algorithms are obviously driving it based on your internet history. All I get are holiday companies, betting and recruitment agencies. I don’t get any political views on Facebook. Perhaps you better review your internet history. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

****ing jokers. Why would you change a proper games start time just so a few sad sacks can watch an atrocious chick match. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It’s not quite as simple as that They have these things called lawn mowers. Ralph checks the grass and picks his “long grass 11”. After handing the team sheet in, the cunning Spaniard pops into the Groundsman’s hut and tells Groundsman Bob to fire up his mower. The upshot is Newcastle have their short grass team whilst we are floundering around with long grass specialists. They could even double bluff us, with Groundsman Bob sat on his mower going up and down the pitch. Ralph thinks “short grass team”, however the cutters are raised too high to cut the grass and again Ralph gets it wrong. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Terrible Bednarek header, Yoshida day dreaming again. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yoshida is having a mare Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

****ing Ward-Prowse thinks he’s got all day in the box. That’s 2 he’s got to do better with. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Translation; Ban things & people I disagree with. You can only inform and try to change opinions if I agree with you. I am a liberal and don’t want free speech banned, BUT I want a regulator to ban people I disagree with. I am a good person. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The left used to be all in favour of free speech, they’re now modern day Mary Whitehouse’s. The pinkos who run the modern Tory party are getting as bad. The mainstream vehicle for the left, the Labour Party, has an absolutely appalling record of anti Semitic hate the past few years, so it’s not confined to the right. Facebook are a private company, they can ban who the hell the like. The market will decide whether they are doing the right thing or are making a error. People crying about it are as bad as the plums who complain about The Sun or Mail. All sides of the political divide need to man up (soggy will probably complain, so I’ll change it to “person” up). Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It’s not liberal to want an innocent man locked up, hounded, and his career ended because he behaved legally but badly. Stop abusing the word. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Give it a rest Soggy. I’m starting to think you’re a misandrist chick, no bloke could post the anti men bile you post. Calm down, suck a Werther's Original & stop defending the indefensible. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Let’s re-sign Gaston as well. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Somebody shut Jenas up, he’s doing my ****ing head in. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Bit worrying for spurs that they’ve let 3 in and Agüero hasn’t had a sniff of goal yet. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Dear god!!!!! Of course there’s a big difference between rape & consensual sex, that’s the point people are trying to make to you. This was not rape, if it was Evans would be inside. It was consensual sex, how many times do you need telling before it sinks in? Who said Evans got her drunk, according to you he’d only just met her. Make your mind up. You seem to think that birds are delicate wall flowers, that need protecting from themselves. I don’t, I think they should have the right to act like men. Go out and get bladdered and then bang whoever they want. I’ve had a go on plenty of 3/10’s when I’ve been polluted and regretted it in the morning. They took advantage of my drunken state, they didn’t rape me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I will always defend the right of men & women to drink too much and indulge in threesomes, because their sex life & legal behaviour has absolutely nothing to do with me. What are you the moral police, maybe you should move to Dubai or Pakistan where your intolerance will be welcomed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is complete and utter pony. You seem stuck in the 70’s. Birds past sexual history (except in exceptional circumstances ) is never taken into account, neither is what she was wearing or whether she was covered in bruises. You’ve just made a load of pony up based on your dislike of white working class blokes. Had it been a white working class bird involved in a threesome with Mohamed & Aabidullah you’d be singing a different song. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Welcome to my world Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t know where to start with this catalogue of pony. You’re now throwing guilt at the other innocent party as well as Evans. It is not for you, or me, or anyone else to decide if anyone is “technically” guilty of rape. Had you made such an outrageous comment in a newspaper I suggest you’d be facing a libel charge. You really need to distinguish between bad behaviour and illegal behaviour, especially when it involves matters like rape. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Am I a terrorist apologist if I declare that the Birmingham six are innocent and were victims of a miscarriage of justice. After all they were convicted originally. Is someone convicted in an unsafe conviction, then acquitted, less innocent than someone merely acquitted Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

A victim of rape, is a victim. End of. The disagreement on this thread is whether this bird was raped or not. Some of us think the best way to determine whether she was is that a jury sit and listen to all the evidence and then decide. Others think that this isn’t the best way and they just decide from reading newspaper articles. Soggy seems to believe that it’s somehow a draw, that one particular jury acquitted him and one convicted him. What he fails to mention is that 3 of the countries senior judges sat and decided that his original conviction was unsafe. His original lawyers have paid him a substantial amount of compensation based on their negligent defence. The first trial was clearly unsafe and his defence team incompetent. Once he received a fair trial, a proper defence, and the birds previous immoral behaviour came out, he was proven to be innocence. An innocent man, who has served time is clearly a victim. There’s no need to play judge & jury, as we have the real thing in this case. Judges decided his conviction was unsafe, a jury found him innocent. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It was her third threesome in a few days. Was her drink spiked every time. You’re defending some dirty chick just because a white male was involved. She wasn’t some innocent that was taken advantage of. A FEMALE judge ruled that her sexual past was relevant in this case, it’s clear why that was. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There was a bloke in the Kingsland who shouted “get up you black ****” when Keïta dived in the box second half. I wasn’t 100% sure that was what I heard, and as it was behind me wasn’t really sure who shouted it. Later the same voice shouted “black bastard” at Mane. That one was clear, and I was pretty sure who shouted it as there’s a bloke with a big gob who mouths off every week (although that was the first time I’d heard him use that sort of stuff). He also shouted “cut his head off” when Salah had the ball (not sure if this is acceptable, but I felt uncomfortable). To my knowledge nobody confronted him (including myself). I think most people were like me, unsure of whether he actually said it, and then unwilling to speak out as he sits with a bunch of blokes. All week I wrestled with it, wondering if I should have done something. Thursday I emailed the club asking what process they have if I witness this behaviour again. They advised pointing him out to steward. Fast forward to Saturday and the bloke wasn’t in his seat. Maybe a coincidence, but I can’t remember him missing a game previously. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pony. The jury decided the prosecution couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was incapable of consent. Unfortunately, you keep claiming that she wasn’t, you seem to think your opinion in more valid than 12 ordinary citizens. As for the witnesses. The judge in the first trial ruled that her past sexual history was inadmissible. The judge at the second trial used a rarely used exceptional reason ruling to allow it. The witness’ testified that they’d had a threesome with her days before Evans. Testified that the language she used to encourage them and the sex acts she asked them to indulge in, were exactly as Evans and his mate had said. There was also evidence that she’d had another threesome days after the Evans incident as well. This is the BBC correspondent’s take on it. “In rape trials, defence lawyers are banned from cross-examining an alleged victim about their sexual behaviour or history to protect them from humiliating treatment. But there can be exceptional reasons to ditch that rule in the interests of a fair trial. The Court of Appeal said Mr Evans's case was one of those very rare exceptions. It said that two other men who had sex with the woman had described their encounters with her in highly specific terms that were virtually indistinguishable from Mr Evans's own account of what had happened. One of the encounters occurred days before the alleged rape - and the other in the days that followed. On each occasion the woman had been drinking heavily and the sex occurred in a very specific way - including the words she used to encourage her partner. Each time she woke up saying she had no memory of what had happened. Lady Justice Hallett, one of the country's top judges, said that these events were so similar to what Mr Evans had described that a jury had to hear about them before deciding whether the woman had been incapable of giving her consent.” She obviously likes men & enjoys threesomes, there’s nothing wrong with that. In fact I wish more chicks were like it. However, she’s not the victim here, Evans is. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk