Jump to content

Lord Duckhunter

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    18377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter

  1. He’s really not..... He can’t get in our side under 4 different managers. Nobody seems the slightest bit interested in signing him. He’ll just fade away exactly like Gaston did....... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  2. What a load of old pony. The establishment is now the metropolitan liberal elite. The old school tie pony is so last century. Did New Labour pass you by? #draintheswamp Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  3. So have I. Just needs one in off his backside or a tap in, and he’ll be up and running. Hasn’t missed absolute sitters like Long does. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  4. Our worst performer yesterday, flattered to deceive yet again. Is there anybody still thinking he’ll come good? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  5. Spot on. The chumps in the TV studios just don’t get it. It’s so frustrating. Clear & obvious applies to subjective decisions, offside is a factual call (as is the new handball rule regarding goals). What they don’t seem to get their heads round is the fact the linos are told to keep their flags down. For all we know without VAR the Lino would have flagged the initial offside yesterday. People seem to be implying that hairline close decisions shouldn’t be ruled offside. The implication of that is the officials will decide what’s “close enough” and what isn’t. A factual decision becomes a subjective one, and subjective decisions lead to more arguments and accusations of bias than factual ones. The only way you’ll ever stop goals like yesterday’s being ruled out is if you use VAR upon appeal (like cricket does). Maybe Saints wouldn’t have appealed it (nobody seemed to think it was offside) or had run out of appeals. The simple fact is that if VAR checks every goal, offside ones will be ruled out. It doesn’t matter if it’s 10 yards or a toe nail offside. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  6. It’s not about working in the public sector , it’s about using it. Millions of people who do, up and down England, decided public services were safer in Tory hands than Steptoe & his band of extremists. The people who matter more than the lefties who work in it , overwhelmingly rejected your pony....... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  7. If they’re offside by a toe nail, they’re offside. You wouldn’t say the ball didn’t cross the goal line by a whisker, therefore it should be goal. Do you think there won’t be hairline offsides under your daylight rule. Wherever you draw a line, it’s a line. If the defenders toe nail is stopping daylight, they’ll be a ****ing debate over that. There’s only two outcomes regarding offside, on or off. No rule change will ever change that. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  8. What???? You don’t agree with the rule that offside should be offside. How would you change it, someone offside will in the future be onside? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  9. Pony Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  10. It’s actually quite refreshing that people find Miranda, Mrs Brown’s boys & Gavin & Stacey a load of pony. I’d add Little Britain, That ****ing idiot Reeves, young ones & Absolutely Fabulous to that list of trash. As for the new open all hours, wtf is David Jason playing at.... Curb your enthusiasm. Phoenix Nights Fawlty Towers Early Doors Royal Family Cheers Steptoe My favourites. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  11. He’s not. It’s about as funny as herpes. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Brilliant, celebrating in Victoria waiting for coach home. 12 of us buzzing. Every single player a hero today. The whole ****ing lot of them.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. Exactly You could quadruple everyone’s income and you wouldn’t reduce “poverty “. Hell, you could increase everyone’s income 10 fold and it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference. Equally you could make the top 90% as poor as the bottom 10% and abolish “poverty “ altogether. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. We haven’t because we didn’t elect Brown, Milliband or Corbyn.........thank god..... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. There is hardly any child "poverty" in this country, the word has been abused by lefties like you. You don't end food banks by chucking money around, giving free tuition fees to middle class kids, free broadband to millionaire's, thousands to rich chicks of a certain age and winter fuel allowance to Paul McCartney. You can't run public services if you've run out of money. "My lot" care just as much as "you lot", the difference is the market has made people wealthier than your weird Corbynonics ever will.
  17. Have you ever considered that some people care about the unfortunate & vulnerable just as much as you do, but just disagree on the best way to do so. I reckon soft arsed lefties like you want the latest iPhone just as much as any Tory does. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  18. Most people would of worked out my answer by just reading my post. However, as you’re clearly struggling I’ll answer. Whether I think we’ll be better off or not is irrelevant, post Maastricht I’d vote to leave regardless. Sovereignty issues can’t be judged by GDP, it’s bizarre anyone thinks it can be. Would Mexican’s or Canadian’s sell theirs to The US if it meant a higher GDP & wealthier population? Personally , I don’t think leaving will make much difference to the average Joe, but as I said that’s irrelevant. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  19. You don’t get to start telling me why I voted a particular way. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. Spot on. Some things are more important than money. I'm sure a lot of independent countries would been better off staying within a British Empire, did economics even enter their minds. I've never understood why The Sweaties got so hung up with currency, oil prices and economics, surely you either believe in an independent Jock land or you don't. Who says " I believe in Scotland being independent , provided it doesn't cost me money". Hardly Braveheart is it?
  21. You voted for a party that is controlled by a far left cult and is being investigated by the EHRC. Voting for them is pretty supportive imo. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. Gazzaniga lol.... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  23. I have have a problem with people who are supportive of the far left & anti semitism...............people like, erm, you!!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. Really good performance yesterday. Nobody was off colour. Stephens & Ward-Prowse had their best games for a long time, Redmond was better than of late. Ings & Long look a decent partnership & the full backs seemed more committed than last week. Yes, they were poor, but we’ve played poor sides before & missed the opportunity to put them to bed. I don’t understand criticism of Jack Grealish on here he worked hard, tried stuff and worried me every time he received the ball. He’d fit in a Chelsea or Spurs no bother. Ings is a class above the rest of the side. If we could get Adams firing, buy a proper centre half and a midfielder who creates stuff, we’d be pretty decent. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  25. Shame, end of an era Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...