Lord Duckhunter

Griffin does support Brexit but you don’t find me supporting him. More importantly Brexit supporting MP’s won’t be cheering him, claiming Brexit trumps bad behaviour. Bercow has had very serious allegations of bullying and sexism swept under the carpet purely because he is useful for the extremists in their attempt to bypass democracy. If you’re happy with that it tells us a lot about your moral compass. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After having a long holiday. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly, a racist one at that. Still I reckon they’d cheer Nick Griffin & Rolf Harris if they supported Remain. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

As he considers himself a ground breaking speaker, no doubt he’ll approve of the precedent it’ll set. The whole Bercow thing shows labour and pinkos hypocrisy perfectly. A proven racist & bully kept in place because of his Brexit stance. As a senior labour figure said “Brexit trumps bad behaviour.” The last 2 speakers have been absolutely woeful, let’s hope Hoyle gets the role and restores a bit of dignity to this crucial role. The politicisation of the speakers role will cause untold damage to future Parliament’s. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Really? Wow.....you remainers are so very clever. I don’t think there’s one person who thinks we’re going to trade under WTO rules for perpetuity. Not one. It’s not just oh so clever remainers like you that realise we’ll have to negotiate a trade deal. Most of the ERG favour a Canada style arrangement and I’d imagine most of them realise this involves a negotiation and doesn’t happen the day we leave. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You claimed I did t think there’s going to be an election this year. Where did I write that? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What a childish response. The ERG voted against it because they wanted no deal. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Perry, Ellwood, Morgan, Hancock , off the top of my head. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I tend to avoid answering abusive messages. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where on earth have I said that? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Second referendum wouldn’t change anything. If Leave won again, who would enact it? This bunch of MPs have proved that they won’t. Labour will stand on a platform of second referendum, as will Lib Dem’s. If you want a second referendum, the route is via a GE, how else are you going to get it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

People understand it just as much as condescending people like you. They just know that Parliament will not agree any deal that involves leaving. They’ll find any old excuse to vote against, to delay, in the hope that the public mood turns significantly enough to make a re run viable. Once we leave with no deal, we’re out. There’s no turning back, no revoking A50, no delay. The only way back is to rejoin. Remainers have brought this on themselves , they had a perfectly acceptable deal (from a Remain point of view) on the table. A deal that gave them a pathway to any long term relationship anybody desired,except being a member. Which is exactly why they voted it down. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is it with you lot? Democracy seems to frighten you. If the people give a mandate to Boris, so be it. Equally, if they give one to Corbyn or that daft sweaty Lib Dem , the same. Not wanting an election in case you lose, lol. Modern lefties for you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s shiete this season, plastic glasses. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pony. Backbone would be going to the people & seeking a mandate. Putting their cushy jobs on the line, risking being rejected by the public. Squatting in Westminster scared your views maybe rejected, is not showing “backbone”Douglas Carswell & Mark Reckless showed backbone. If they thought for one minute the country agreed with them, they’d put it to the vote. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If he sought an election under the FTPA he gets to fix the date. If he passed a one line “not withstanding the FTPA a General Election will be on 15th Oct” act , that’ll be the law of the land and therefore illegal to change it. It’s all semantics anyway. The opposition know Boris will secure a majority with Nigel’s help & therefore are running scared of the people. The country needs an election and they’ll punish the Remain extremists when one comes. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Johnson is a raving pinko on everything apart from Brexit. That fact is indisputable despite the half wits on here trying to portray him as some sort of right wing dictator. Take a few minutes to look at his policy positions o over the years. He’s a Cameroon pinko. End of. That said, his Brexit policy is sound & he’s purging the party of Lib Dem’s. Therefore he has my temporary support until we ditch him for a proper Tory. There’s absolutely nothing moderate about trying to suppress a democratic vote, so I don’t recognise this description of “moderates”. The people he’s purging are out of touch extremists and we’re better off without them . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There’s a complete and utter lack of self awareness around the “rebels” and assorted soap dodgers losing their mind over this. A rebel alliance that is mounting a resistance to maintain the status quo, lining up besides the bankers and big business. And a coup where the dictator is trying to give the people a vote. Bizarre!!!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When did he do that then? He did exactly the same as every single PM has done, and after the longest parliamentary session since the Civil war. Labour were calling for a Queen’s speech in the summer, you have to prorogue to have one. If he wanted to he could of done what you claimed and prorogued until 1/11. But he didn’t. You lot are unhinged. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Excuses, excuses. There’s absolutely zero chance Boris will propose an election on a certain date, get HoC approval and then go to the queen and change the date. Won’t happen, would be electoral suicide. The reason he won’t propose a one line bill stating the date is because that’s amendable. With Bercow it’ll get amended and will also have to pass the Remainers in The Lords. The opposition is actually doing what they claim Boris is doing, imposing their views by bypassing a democratic process. They’re trying to push an extension without going back to the people. The reason is, they know they’ll lose and Boris will have a mandate to leave “do or die” on 31/10. We’re heading for a constitutional crisis brought on entirely by the Remain extremists squatting in Westminster. We’re at the end of the road and an election is clearly needed. The British people are pretty fair minded and just as changing the date of any election will hurt Boris, standing in the way of a much needed GE will cost them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

God are you really that gullible. One way to guarantee no deal is to win an election prior to 31/10. They’ve been offered one, but have bottled it. They know full well they face a day of reckoning when they face their constituents. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why’s your side of the argument scared of one then. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s actually the complete opposite. It’s Chucka, Soubry and their merry band of pinkos that keep splitting, renaming themselves and changing parties. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not odd at all. The Cameron intake damaged the party and selected prole based on box ticking than political beliefs. The upshot is we have MP’s changing parties like they change phone companies or gas/ electric providers. The party has always contained sopping wet pinkos, but people like Wollaston , Allen & Lee haven’t got a Tory bone in their body. They used the party as a vehicle to get to Westminster. The swamp is being drained. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk