benjii

Close thread: yes. Sub-forum: wtf?! Why? Let's have a GK sub-forum, an RB sub-forum, an LB sub-forum etc... a boardroom sub-forum, a ground facilities sub-forum (with separate micro-sub-forums for beer, food, betting and the crappers, obviously), a ticketing sub-forum.... ad nauseum.

What's negative about it? If our least fit player is fitter than the entire Bournemouth squad then that is remarkably positive (albeit stonkingly hard to believe).

You seem a bit touchy. If true, it is funny; if untrue, it is funny. That was all.

Lol.

It's a fact really. One band changed the face of alternative music. The other produced a couple of derivative but decent albums and then embarked upon a career of peddling middle-of-the-road, parent friendly, family day out, poprock. Is Dave Grohl a more talented musical polymath than Kurt Cobain? Quite certainly. Are Nirvana a million times more important and better than the Foo Fighters? Most definitely.

Careful, Hypo has already put detective Baj on the case.

Anyway, this is how you "smash it" live: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg6JFNOn6YE Remarkable.

Why would anyone compare present Foo Fighters with Nirvana anyway? It's like comparing Steps with Anal **** (if one of them was in both bands).

Yeah, his fault though, the stupid lanky ****. Great shout. I was gutted when we signed him. Always used to hold him out as a kind of joke player. However, he was probably our best player at the time.

you are such a sad ****.

Critical hindsight is somewhat irrelevant. It's what they did. They changed music and changed lives on a grand scale.

Move away from the semantics and look at what he is actually saying. There is nothing surprising about a youngish teen hearing an album for the first time and thinking "****, that's changed my understanding of music forever!". I remember the first time I heard Nevermind and that's exactly what happened. I didn't need to be a contemporary music savant to realise I was listening to something important; in my life at least.

Your first paragraph is correct; if the buyers communicated clearly to the seller the need for the furniture to fit through a door of "x and y" dimensions and the seller was aware that was a requirement of the furniture then you probably would be entitled to a refund.

Are you finding his posts difficult to understand and on a different intellectual plane to yours then?

"Gays" instead of "queers" and "coloureds" instead of "darkies". HTH

I've written off Richardson to some extent. Hope he serves me a nice slice o' pie.

Indeed

I disagree strongly.

At the end of the day we are gearing up for Prem football and it's simply not feasible to have large swathes of prime seating in a 32k stadium flogged off at a heavily discounted price. The end.

Weellllll.....

By the way, that mock-up is great. The 9 obviously doesn't have a clue about the visual arts.

11 days to go, kit ******s!!! God, I am soooooooo excited. Off for a quick hand shandy.

TBF - this was obviously ********.

No way!!!! I thought it would be something really profound that goes to the very core of morality.

If 90% of them renew at the higher price, then actually it's fine.