benjii

Word up bro's! Peep dis nice lickle video of da storm and ting. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~2391587,00.html

I will certainly doubt our ability to hit the ground running if we don't at least get a draw.

Or it could, of course, be a different formation altogether!

What? Calm down, dear.

I wonder if Chamberlain is playing centre mid in the second half. Looking at that list the most likely line-up seems to be: -------------------TF----------------------- DB----------RJ------------DS----------DanH Gult/AC----Guly/AC-----DeanH----------RD ------------Doble----------Johnno Quick I suppose another option is that Johnno Quick plays LM and RD plays central with Guly or AC upfront. Forecast. Butterfield, Jaidi, Seaborne, Dickson. Chamberlain, Hammond, Harding, Forte. Guly, Doble

FFS. We are selling KD and Cork. My God!! Just when you think things are looking up. I am sooooooooo angry.

No, but I think if someone started a thread called, "anything to do with Leicester, and you can shove the cup up your ass" they would probably get committed. In fact, I will keep an eye on any thread titles on threads that Dalek starts as I feel he may need care.

Does anyone remember that programme that went out on the eve of World Cup 2006 (I think it was on Ch4) that featured people impersonating Sven and Becks etc? It was filmed as a fly-on-the-wall stlye documentary as Sven got to grips with work in England. It was foooking hilarious.

I don't want to see Hypo squashing his bewbs together.

"He couldn't motivate a flea"... Now, please indulge me. I know what you are trying to say. You are trying to say that he lacks motivational skills. I cannot for one second, however, see how the statement that a person cannot motivate a flea is supposed to be evidence that the person lacks motivational skills. Fleas are very basic creatures. They do not comprehend human methods of communication. Quite how any human is supposed to motivate a flea in any way at all is unclear and the prospect of anyone being able to do so seems pretty remote, to say the least. So, to say that someone cannot motivate a flea should not in any way to be taken as a reproach.

Now Antonov just needs the FSA to change its view of his businesses as showing a pattern of deliberately misleading and dishonest behaviour and all will be well. Maradonna, Riquelme and all the other people who Ho' thought would be joiing can ride into town. But of course he never thought any of that really. PMSL etc....

Indeed. You only had to look at the appalling Select Committee yesterday to see the malignant intent dripping off some of those politicians. Yes, two of the MET individuals were pathetic and risible, but so were the likes of Vaz. Bit of revenge for "cash for questions"... yes please!

Corp will reply with something like: "PMSL, you lot think you're really clever but actually I know something, but I won't tell you what you'll just have to believe me. PMSL By the way, I am not a complete **** and do not post on here out of a misguided sense of superiority but because I am passionate about accurate reportage and despite having said loads of things which were complete rubbish on this thread I'll find a few posts which you can't prove to be complete rubbish yet and point at them. PMSL Oh and PFC fans are the new guardian of the fit and proper persons rule and are at the vanguard of reform in world football. PMSL"

I think it's fair to say that naked hangliding with Wally Downes won't be on the menu this year.

Oh yeah, NAMBLA, or whatever.

Could be something in that...

Yep, supporting Saints certainly isn't boring!

Crikey, good point. Also, I can faintly hear some sort of syncopated, electronic warbling...... sounds a bit like "hoooddleee, hooooddllee, exsperminate...."

Quite possibly, but they did bring an offer of actual hard cash to the table; which is more than Lowe and Wilde ever managed.

In hindsight, "anyone but Rupert" was pretty prudent. Let's just have a brief history recap... At the time of the SISU offer, Lowe was not involved with the club in any way other than as a shareholder. He only held about 6% but due to the fragmented nature of our shareholdings he was still one of the most influential shareholders. SISU made an offer that would have seen them inject £12m new money into the club whilst the existing shareholders would have retained their holdings, although their control would have been diluted due to the new rights placement. The board at the time supported the SISU offer. The major shareholders all decided they would vote against the offer. Subsequently, Crouch ended up in control of the business. He appointed a good young manager and we stayed up. He appeared to have the support of our bankers. Meanwhile, Lowe and Wilde had been lining up their return. Why did Lowe return? He obviously believed he could do a better job than Crouch. He obviously thought we were still heading for insolvency. And what did Lowe achieve: insolvency and relegation. He did the worst possible job. So, "anyone but Lowe": it certainly couldn't have been worse.

You were only wrong because we got lucky with Markus and have since been promoted. At the time, you were right.

Yeah? So they were going to inject £12m for 55% of the club. That fits with what I said. EDIT - funny how that last quote seemed to think Lowe backed the bid?!

You are correct that my ban has 0% effect.

Can you please stop spamming our thread. It is tiresome. Your little peaks of activity then months in the wilderness are not welcome. They are funny at first but we are in week 2, at least, of your latest appearance and, frankly, the levels of dickheadishness on the board are simply insufferable.

No, it's make sense. It's an overhang. What do you mean, it makes no sense to describe something as 110%? As a percentage, how much of 100 is 110? Of course it makes sense. You are hereby banned from contribution to any mathematical threads. Sorry.