benjii

That was in recognition of HMRC sorting out the skates. Obviously, it's a tad redundant now (although they're still fooked!). Might get a new one later if I can be arsed. And no, not a wind-up. A tad polemical, sure, but then if you're going to start a new thread you should write something interesting. The underlying message is authentic and quite a few posters seem to have agreed with me.

And why did it need a meeting with NC to tell the player the reason if there was a training ground bust up? "Hey lads, remember on, er... Sunday - yes it must've been Sunday - remember that training ground bust up? Do you? Yeah? Well, that's what the sacking's about. Oh, and by the way, I will not be rushed. Cheerio."

I reckon three.

I've done a Rule 1, for those of you who like this sort of thing (it's not pron!):

Similar looking!

Oh right, cheers. So that will be a three-matcher. That's annoying.

Whatever happened to that chap with the specs who hung around the training ground under Lowe? Can't remember his name. Looked a bit sly.

Some media outlets (including Saints' official Twitter - which, by the way, has rubbished the Hart rumours again) are suggesting that Barnard was booked for the tackle and then booked again for his reaction to it. Solent thought the ref just ****ed up by getting his yellow out instead of his red. I would like to hear what other people thought. If anyone would like to recreate the incident using Subboteo/cartoons/chocolate coated raisins or nuts, and post the photos on here to help explain then I would be overcome with emotion. Thanks.

Will every local paper do this and pretend they have come up with a brilliant witty idea when in fact they're just essentially copying the Plymouth one?

Furry muff!

Yeah, I don't doubt that if the tickets were cheaper more people would go. I think we can take that as a FACT. Not surprised it's down though. Last season it was a fun novelty. This season it could still have been fun but it's really a competition we didn't want to ever play in again.

That's really weird. That would almost suggest that following a story being run on their sports news service about a particular manager, Sky have taken more money in bets on that manager than other bookies, wouldn't it? What a strange coincidence!

Charlton had 4,600 last night. Wednesday are playing at home tonight I think. Just looking down the fixture list I doubt anyone else had more than we did.

Nah, it'll be at least 17k (assuming Rochdale bring about 500 max).

I suppose a pertinent question would be: "did he do a better job as a left winger than Hammond, Schneiderlin or Wotton would have done?" I suspect the answer is "yes". That's not to say he should have played there ahead of Dickson or Mills but it also doesn't follow that he's crap or not a very good CM. Funnily enough, Barney's red card might turn out to be a good thing as it would have been a brave decision to drop him, or MS or DH to accommodate Guly in the centre but it is suddenly a lot easier to pick a 4-5-1 formation.

I shall not take your post at face value

I think I agree. Unless the problems, whatever they were, were threatening an iminent implosion I would've stuck with AP for now. But... if we win on Saturday and have a new manager in soon who is a good manager, I doubt any harm will be done.

I don't think that at all but I suspect that many of those who would abuse and crucify him based on unsubstantiated hearsay probably are.

Yes, I agree. And usually it is harmless fun. Bravado, outright lies ("Graham Potter would batter Ronaldo in a dribble-off" etc), banter etc... I just hope that a negative atmosphere doesn't take hold without real justification. There is no cause to fight at the moment. We are still in a good position relative to our immediate competitors. This is not a "Lowe out" situation. There is no short-term pain that needs to be felt for long-term gain. All IMO, but I still think we're on an upward trajectory.

It would tie in with the wording of the club statement. "...it is essential to make changes to the First Team management and coaching. These targets for sustained and significant progress embrace both the First Team and the Football Development & Support Centre as integrated, co-operative units." NB in particular, "co-operative". It seems, if true, that Pardew was either trying to usurp, or at least was not happy with, the management structure of the club. If that was the case then I guess he had to go. Surprising if ture though, as it was long stated that there would be an interim layer between team manager and chairman (the DoF/Sporting Director etc).

No problem at all with people being disappointed by the sacking. I think he would've taken us up this season (unless there is a lot of unrest behind the scenes on the playing side) so if it was purely a football decision I will be against it unless an outstanding replacement is appointed. I'm not sure exactly why he was sacked. The most informative piece so far seems to have been that BBC blog which suggested that there was disquiet amongst the staff but that, in footballing terms, Cortese was a bigger Pardew fan than Markus was. Now, I'm not sure who, what, why etc but if it was a new thing that threatened to develop into a big thing then it's better to sort it sooner rather than later. One area where I do have faith is that Cortese has not suddenly gone on some sort of frugal exercise - it is not cheap to sack people like that and I don't think we're going to be appointing some no-mark replacement. This is not Lowe. This is Cortese. He saved us by bringing in loads of money. Without him we would probably be right in the **** still - a third tier Pompey. He saved us, that doesn't give him carte-blanche to do what he likes without reprisal but if his modus operandi is to keep information in house then I, for one, think we owe it to him to respect that without resorting to personal abuse without full command of the facts.

Any of the ones in bold would do a good job IMO.

No, I am clearly not saying that. I am saying that flying off the handle without knowing how the dust is settling is just silly. And I don't think Pardew has been sacked for football results reasons - if he was going to be sacked for those he would've gone in the summer. What I am advocating is a more considered appraisal of the situation. Remember that: We are the biggest fish in our pond. We are a fish that a lot of anglers would like to hook. We are a fish that requires minimal preparation to cook (er... not sure where I'm going with this). Remember that: We are still in a bloody good position. I think one of the main reasons we are in that position is the vision of the man in charge. He's just done something that he knew would be unpopular. He must've had a good reason for doing it. He is more important, IMO, than Alan Pardew and I have seen nothing to suggest that we are not still in an excellent position in terms of our future. I just hope that, before people decide to express their annoyance (publically), they ask themselves if it's really the best thing to do? Do we not still have an excellent chance of going up? Do we not still have a part to play? If a mood of negativity develops it will not be anyone's fault other than the fans who would sooner go off on one than think things through.

You'd better not or I will have to spank your bare botty.

Did you hear it from a steward?