benjii

My offer stands.

Don't think so.

Army would batter them in a fight.

Da little feckin oooieeejets. I will give each one a £1 to go back and help with the development of Oiireland.

In a nutshell!

I'm pretty sure they're not trying to lose.

Well we always used to win. HTH.

Dave thinks the fans will be disappointed with the first half. You know, he may have a point. It hadn't occurred to me but it is definitely plausible.

Or samba skills.

No width or pace.

3 out and out strikers. Interesting.

Oh no - good point. What with that and their refereeing conspiracy against us we're boogerred.

Merrington - "looks as if he could possibly be coming on." No **** Dave.

@ Window Cleaner.

For what position though? CM? I sincerely hope we're signing another CM so he would be fourth or fifith choice if that's the case. At RB we currently have three better options, although admittedly Murty might deceide to hang up the boots. I think a move would be good for him.

I've seen a photo of him wearing next season's kit.

Do-or-die match for James IMO.

I would take him for £2m or less but otherwise it would be a big gamble IMO. What if we don't go up? We'll sell him for a profit or something. Terrible.

I haven't read the Act but if it has been drafted by the current government then I expect it is massively widely drafted with the potential to catch a whole load of things it shouldn't catch, with the potential to impose serious consequences upon a whole load of things it shouldn't be imposing serious consequences on. That's what they have done with most of the other important legislation. It will then be released along with some vague promise of guidance as to how it will be enforced by the authorities.

How about a "best local tanning shop" and a "best local hairdressers" section too?

Exactly. If you wrote that on the side of Westminster, however..... You would be a very naughty boy who is a vandal and criminal and everyone, including me, would deplore your actions.

lol.

Well I suppose she will be one of tomorrow's business leaders, employing thousands and contributing to the Treasury's coffers in an almighty way. Or not.

Anything which is aimed at financially incentivising "families" is silly IMO. The average cost of a wedding is something like £20k. You can't apply the drone-rationality of economics to something as complicated, as supra-economical, as human, as whether or not family units will exist and remain strong. Targetted help to ensure kids are kept out of poverty is fine but it should be in the form of children's clothes vouchers, food vouchers and heating allowances etc...