benjii

Cheaper than Milan!

No? Very roomy.

Chill out man, Mark Fry is bigger than Matty and Jesus combined.

I prefer Hypo's.

I know what point you are making but unless you have some inside info then I think this is a bit unfair. It's the very nature of the beast that we know what, if any, PR they've undertaken (that's the point of PR!) but we don't have a clue what's been going on behind the scenes.

Actually, I take that back. I expect it's higher but more like £5k than £25k.

Lovely stuff.

FFS. They don't have a team of ten people spending all day, every day on it. I expect a daily rate would be more like £2k - £3k. Published headline rates are negotiable and deals on remuneration can be done with the creditors. Do you seriously think they're charging £125k per week? Commercial suicide and utterly ridiculous.

It is far too high.

Wotte said we turned down offers for Surman, Lallana and Dyer.

Please do stop peddling this £25k-a-day nonsense.

The bird who does the interviews on Beeb F1 seems quite fit.

Why do they move the ****ing tissue box back to the bathroom every morning? It's ****ing retarded. If I'm in the bathroom and need some tissue I'll use the pointy bog roll. If I'm in another part of my suite, I want the ****ing tissues. Stupid.

Milan is quite boring really and shockingly expensive (well, for drinking anyway). Rome or Florence are much better bets in Italy. Barcelona. Munich. Berlin. Lisbon. Krakow. All good. Never been to Brussels. Good beer guaranteed though!

Has he signed yet?

Buying Saints.

EDIT: *Changed my mind - was a bland post. No one needed to read it.*

Maybe if they caught a dose of the VD as well from some tart on the beach that might be good?

You're not a new member of the yoof are you? Please keep away from me.

No, but,... er.... *hot under the collar*.... but Lawrie was on the best part of a gazzilion quid a year... and er... :mad:

Once again gives a lie to the myth peddled by some of the more demented on here that our fans are in any way to blame whatsoever for any of the ills that have befallen the club. We have good support and anyone who knows anything about football is aware of this.

How do you propose he "veto" it? When did he pander? When he loaned out Rasiak? When he loaned out Skacel? When he appointed a largely unknown and, to many, initially uninspiring manager? Your post just shows a lack of understanding and misaprehension of the facts which is common amongst people who seek to blame Crouch for this. Crouch is not very good at speaking "on his feet". Apart from that, I fail to see what he has done wrong. You could say he shouldn't have supported Wilde but frankly, he shouldn't have supported Lowe either. If you cast your mind back he was actually trying to broker a truce between the two and was roundly criticised by many for wavering in his support for Wilde.

FFS, really? What a ****.