-
Posts
9,609 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Dark Munster
-
Yep. And on top of that he's only here because that Turkish club didn't want to pay our asking price. And imagine if we'd had Tall Paul last season, along with a semi-decent manager who would want and know how to use him and the rest of our squad. I reckon we'd have been right up there with Leicester. Instead we have a moron of a manger who is not only content to impose on us his boring, suicidal possession around the back football, but one who also thinks his pals Stephens, Smallbone, etc. are superior to decent players like Paul.
-
Saints 2-3 Liverpool - Match Thread
Dark Munster replied to Weston Super Saint's topic in The Saints
Most of us, but certainly not that idiot Martin. -
Saints 2-3 Liverpool - Match Thread
Dark Munster replied to Weston Super Saint's topic in The Saints
Fair play to that Scouser, very insightful and he knows his history. Obviously he enjoyed the times when we beat Utd! This post on that thread caught my eye: You don't have to be patient mate, it'll happen very soon (and often) after kick off. -
Not really. The jury returned sometime ago to give their verdict: Rasmus and his motley crew of SR muppets are guilty on all counts of the crimes of being frauds who know the square root of f*ck all about running a football club (yet alone three, FFS), and of squandering hundreds of millions of Dragan's money.
-
Saints 2-3 Liverpool - Match Thread
Dark Munster replied to Weston Super Saint's topic in The Saints
Not a chance to make the playoffs. But if we finish bottom we will get the first draft pick. -
So Saints and Liverpool fans are in agreement!
-
Luggy’s record was 1.23 points per game. Comfortably mid table level. He was sacked in his second season after 2 matches, one win and one loss. Allegedly he lost the dressing room. Replaced by Wigley followed by Saggy.
-
Saints 2-3 Liverpool - Match Thread
Dark Munster replied to Weston Super Saint's topic in The Saints
My first choice is always a Saints win. I can’t decide what my second choice is: a plucky draw which otherwise would be a good result against the top team, but given the shit we’re in, is fairly useless point wise and buys RM more time, or a jolly good rogering 10-0 to force the muppets in charge to take action now. Definitely if we lose I want it to be a thrashing. Rip the plaster off. -
I don’t hate him. We’ve had plenty of appalling managers over the decades. My ire is directed at the Danish charlatan responsible for choosing three of them, and refusing to sack his latest one.
-
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/nov/12/us-election-bluesky-users-flee-x-twitter-trump-musk
-
Should Dragan Šolak remove Rasmus Ankersen from the SFC board?
Dark Munster replied to Dark Munster's topic in The Saints
If Dragan buys Rasmus a one way ticket to Turkey he could then bring someone in who actually knows something about football. -
Irrelevant. He’s played tedious, useless, recycle, sideways, backwards, sideways, backwards, boring, suicidal, ineffective, possession obsession football in our own third of the pitch in most of his matches. AKA Russball.
-
Yep. Offer him a contract for the season. If we go down the contract ends (unless both parties agree to extend it). If he keeps us up the contract automatically extends for a year or two, along with a massive end of season survival bonus thrown in.
-
Should Dragan Šolak remove Rasmus Ankersen from the SFC board?
Dark Munster replied to Dark Munster's topic in The Saints
Ahem, I was one step ahead of you. The poll was made MLG-proof. -
Yes, he's a Charlatan who is primarily responsible for the mess we are in? No, he and Sport Republic have been unfairly criticised and are doing the best they can? If you think Dragan doesn't have the power to remove him, please still feel free to still vote yes/no as a hypothetical assuming that he can. I'm curious of what the general feelings are about Rasmus Ankersen, who is the co-founder and "Mr Football" of Sport Republic.
-
And who rules what are "official acts"? He could order his DOJ toadie to bring charges against his potical enemies, all as an "official act" of counter terrorism. Or pocket billions from the Saudis or Russia in exchange for highly classified documents, all as an "official act". Oh wait, he's probably already done that.
-
The six fascists on the Court have already ripped that up, by granting him immunity from any prosecution of crimes he commits as President as long as they are "official acts".
-
If we are to go down, then the bonus of beating Derby's record low points, and an embarrassing double digit goal loss or two thrown in for good measure, would not just end RM's reign but more importantly maybe, just maybe, be the slap in the face to wake Dragan up that Rasmus W. Ankersen and the rest of his SR clown team are a bunch of frauds and need to be removed.
-
Because they are not being run by drooling morons.
-
Both. I'd call them the Danish Laurel and Hardy, but that would be insulting to Stan and Ollie.
-
If there was, it would be misdirected. The vitriol needs to be aimed at Rasmus W. Ankersen. I wish the fans would surround the directors box and give it to him with both barrels.
-
Good luck!
-
I'll see your "Should have been sacked years ago" and raise you "Shouldn't have been hired in the first place"! For many of us it was clear he was an appalling choice even before he started. Look at the comments at the beginning of the Russell Martin Thread:
-
Puel out!!!
-
We were 2-0 up against Leicester and still ended up losing.