scotty

edam is better than gouda.

This thread is one of those circular arguments that ultimately cannot go anywhere except "I believe", "I dont believe", or "I havent got a f*cking clue". I fall into the latter category, but incline towards the concept of a universe in which time and distance are meaningless outside our own limited realm.

well, I have to say I'm glad thats been cleared up.

tbf, I would guess that very few men posting on here can afford to be choosy....

that is funny. Consider it forwarded

add my name to the list. I'm somewhat less than fond of the skates, but I never understood why the crowd thinks its relevant when we're playing anybody but them. I do quite enjoy the 'put off the keeper' you fat bastard hahahahahaa tho. Juvenile, i know, but we always had a similar kind of whoaaaaaaAAAAAHHHH going at goal kicks, its just given it words now.

I'm joking. He's got a bit of history

edit

lmao, you ought to look around brighton sometime

[fill in punchline]

yep. and the cheering when N'Guessen was subbed was pathetic.

Agreed, he looked like a certainty for a red card. Hes a great player for us and we miss him when hes not playing, so I suppose NA decided on balance to sub him, plus it gave AL a run out. btw, what the hell went on with Fonte and Davis? When Jose headed that ball out for a corner, did KD give him a shout or has Jose gone deaf?

Debatable, but I am sure that deppos having a right old over this thread.

No he's not.

thats an image I could have done without.

I see what you did there.

....and they call themselves cats.

this.

No change there then.

Probably got more pressing things on his mind than twitter. Thats a whole new thread tho

^^dune will be pleased, there will be some great deals on flights to sharm el sheik;)

on BBC now.

snap

dennis

Theres an interesting side-point in what Turks says about whether or not its natural for two men to raise a child, and the subsequent argument. No, its clearly not, but then again its not natural for people to be successfully treated for serious diseases like cancer, or for somebody infertile to have a child via ivf, or for that matter, for loads of people in their nineties to have survived into their nineties. In the 'natural' course of things loads of people are alive today because of unnatural intervention than would otherwise be. I happen to agree that its not ideal for two men to raise a child together, but at the same time the spectre of 'is it natural' is a bit cloudy, I mean is it 'natural' for a human to fly to another continent? Or type something on a forum such as this? We do it because we can and we wish to, if two men want to raise a surrogate child and the law of the land allows it, its a bit hard imho to argue against their right to.