John B

Not very constructive I would have thought

Very true Play offs have been unlikely since the end of August

Seems very reasonable to me but as Lallana's contract ends in 2011 I expect that he maybe sold soon

He is just a footballer sometimes things go right sometimes they dont Ask Saga who probably has more skill than Lambert and has played in the Champions League

A draw against Norwich is OK I would have thought.

I doubt it

Very True

Will Norwich come for a draw? If they do 451 maybe the wrong formation. But with only three strikers available and one a novice 451 seems the best approach

I agree with you

Me too

CB Fry was another so two Saints out of 12

I have a friend of similar age who was a season holder at Charlton until they were relegated. A Londoner by birth who watched Fulham for years moved to Kent and wanted to watch the players of today.

I think we are in a different situation now. Dan was a good signing as we needed a fullback to allow us to consolidate in League 1 Now I think we should be looking for higher quality players to take us to the CCC and beyond and I was asking the question whether a Coventry reject was of suitable quality for a contract If we were back in the summer it would have probably been a good move to have signed him

I would have thought the so called Dutch Jokers know more about football than you or I Apart from that I think a very interesting post which I am in agreement with. I would have thought most would be happy with Davis for the next couple of years surely West Ham would not have wanted to recruit a poor goalkeeper .

I do understand that Coventry are in the Division above us but they are not one of the better teams. Surely if he was any good they would want to keep him. If we are to progress we need to get in really good players otherwise when we get to the CCC we will have to start again in building a team.

Yes I agree When we go up we need to be able to challenge in the CCC. If we build this season finish in the top ten and win the JPT I will be happy

I sometimes wonder if Alpine posts as SOG to have an argument:confused: As most of SOG's posts seem to be directed at him

If he is not good enough for Coventry why should he be good enough for us?

Well that seems obvious but I would have thought that we needed another striker

Do you not realise the only reason Lowe was appointed was to cut costs in order to save the shareholders money. He did cut costs but not enough and we went into administration. But that will not happen again It is simple as that I would have thought. I dont think Wilde would have brought him back unless he he was desperate. The lack of money was the problem caused by paying vast wages to whoever Burley wanted

I think he is older than 77 as it was 1932 when he went to game. Computers have been around for over fifty years so people in their eighties will have worked with them at some time

There was nothing to learn from last season no money meant a poor team. It always does and always will

OK thats good dont know the bloke but he gave me so much pleasure with his goal scoring..

Ireland 1 up tonight