John B

Yes thank you my thoughts too. Do other non Premiership clubs have large debts on Stadiums which they need to service like Derby On the other point I reserve judgement as you just appear to be throwing petrol on a burning fire

Yes I think you have a point there. I was expecting to read a sensible post from UM on the subject

or left

If the rumour is continually discussed it does not mean it is true in anyway

As we were a cash strapped club perhaps we did not have the financial income to be a Premiership club

Well I thought that would be obvious what is the point of not getting behind the new regime.

So we still dont know how long this bid process is going to take do we?.

Let him sign a new contract and then sell him perhaps

It did say club but I agree it was not clear regarding shares as I did not realise the club had shares

Yes well said Miserable Old Git I totally agree a combination of circumstances not entirely one persons fault but probably it was Inevitable that one day we would be relegated from a purely stitistical point of view

You have go then you miserable old git As you say nothing is simple

We had no chairman when we got relegated from the Championship as we were in administration caused by the boards that included Crouch Wilde Hone etc who seriously mismanaged the finances buying players at too high a cost and paying them too much. It was impossible to sell them as they earned too much

I dont think it is as simple as that. Leon sided with Wilde and because of that we over spent and got us into administration. Lowe only got us relegated from the Premiership something which was probably enivitable

Yes I agree that is why it is in their hands to do something. Crouch seems to have money why is he not involved

As Crouch seems to have loads of money it does not seem a problem for him to give it to SFC. But obviously he can do with it what he wants . However in the long term he does not seem to have enough to save the club. Why I wonder is he not involved with the Pinnacle bid where they appear to need a another backer?

You could well ask why John and Euell were bought knowing that it would be difficult to pay for them. Those two signings I feel may have led to our downfall We needed either as we had Rasiak BWP and Saga as strikers I know we had lost Jones and loads of midfield players

I dont know what you really expect his last statement was clear. His next statement will either be Pinnacle have come up with the goods or Pinnacle have not come up with the goods. It is Pinnacle's hands I would have thought not Fry's

You could well be right

As the source is unlikely to be the creditors I would suggest the bidder does not have enough money to satisfy the administrator. The adminstrator works for the creditors not the fans so grreedy is probably not the correct word to use.

Spot on DD

If they dont know saying anything is misleading

I think it may well be Blackpool http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/blackpool/8056270.stm

I dont dispute what you are saying but he was lucky that we did not lose that game but he may well be a good manager. His record at St Mary's and his experience was not that great and I believe that Saints were higher in the League when he joined than when he left.

I agree but I am sure NP is better off at Leicester and he may well have gone there even if offered the job at St Mary's