Window Cleaner

Main board, Lowe and Wilde, you'll be amongst good company. There are 378 campaigns a day at the moment. It really is getting to be a drag.

Probably be raised to the Legion of Honneur for it in France. It's difficult for me to understand English mentality nowadays. The French would just say the same as François Mitterand when his illegitimate(if such a thing exists in France) daughter Masrine came to light. Asked on the 8 o'clock news about it, he simply said "So what". The scandal lasted about 1 second.

Ah but if there were earthquakes in the UK ,Little England would complain about it,someone would probably get sacked as well.

Having seen the young lady in question on Sky News this morning, well I could believe it was all true.

Depends on how much he insists on his current line of attack really. Personally I would say that he ain't that far off, but then ,hey what do I know.

What do you expect . The Stadium is in a slum area, anything that ain't nailed down will be nicked, whatever isn't nicked will be smashed up.

Find a broker, your bank will have a section dealing with that.

Find a broker, your bank will have a section dealing with that.

He might then have to expose his real identity, at least to the mods. You can hide behind various nebulous e-mail addresses for a lot of purposes but for some, like paying by paypal you have to come out further into the open. Loads of good posters have chosen not to pay the fiver, whatever suits them. Given that the forum seems to be a principal arm in the latest destabilisation campaign, perhaps it's those who don't pay who are the wise men (and women).

He might then have to expose his real identity, at least to the mods. You can hide behind various nebulous e-mail addresses for a lot of purposes but for some, like paying by paypal you have to come out further into the open. Loads of good posters have chosen not to pay the fiver, whatever suits them. Given that the forum seems to be a principal arm in the latest destabilisation campaign, perhaps it's those who don't pay who are the wise men (and women).

Mr Chorley was trying to get them involved with one of his open discussion groups. Think there were plans and projects but I've no idea of what happened to them. Local MPs will support any cause, it's in their line of business, especially when their parties aren't doing too well in the opinion polls and they might get their come uppance in the next elections.

Mr Chorley was trying to get them involved with one of his open discussion groups. Think there were plans and projects but I've no idea of what happened to them. Local MPs will support any cause, it's in their line of business, especially when their parties aren't doing too well in the opinion polls and they might get their come uppance in the next elections.

Anyone who thinks that Southampton city Council is in any way interested in Southampton Football club is deluded. IF the council wanted to help the club they'd cut the exorbitant rates.SCC has better things to do with it's money than bailing out a football club which is(directly) supported by about 9% of the city's populace. The other 91% are either armchair fans or don't give a toss.

Anyone who thinks that Southampton city Council is in any way interested in Southampton Football club is deluded. IF the council wanted to help the club they'd cut the exorbitant rates.SCC has better things to do with it's money than bailing out a football club which is(directly) supported by about 9% of the city's populace. The other 91% are either armchair fans or don't give a toss.

Baseya isn't doing much just now. He's on a pro contract at Lille but hasn't played any first team football. He's had a few runs out for their CFA or reserve side.Scored 2 goals. I don't think he'll hang around long at Lille although he has a 4 year contract. Perhaps Rudi Garcia doesn't rate him. Think Puel signed him but he's gone to Lyon now,where he is,by the way, doing a none too great job. Oh they're still top but nowhere near as easily as under Houiller or even Perrin.

Baseya isn't doing much just now. He's on a pro contract at Lille but hasn't played any first team football. He's had a few runs out for their CFA or reserve side.Scored 2 goals. I don't think he'll hang around long at Lille although he has a 4 year contract. Perhaps Rudi Garcia doesn't rate him. Think Puel signed him but he's gone to Lyon now,where he is,by the way, doing a none too great job. Oh they're still top but nowhere near as easily as under Houiller or even Perrin.

Saint Robbie, if 30% or more of the shares of a PLC are for sale I think we'd be automatically placed in bid situation. So even if Wilde's shares are for sale it doesn't mean that the club is for sale.

Saint Robbie, if 30% or more of the shares of a PLC are for sale I think we'd be automatically placed in bid situation. So even if Wilde's shares are for sale it doesn't mean that the club is for sale.

Nope, maybe he's not that desperate. This is going to run and run, don't think I'll comment on it any more.

Nope, maybe he's not that desperate. This is going to run and run, don't think I'll comment on it any more.

Don't count on it; For 4 million plus shares the price would be roughly 35p per share, even now.

Don't count on it; For 4 million plus shares the price would be roughly 35p per share, even now.

ESB you are not obviously a legal eagle, passing on incorrect information without a source quote is as good as saying it yourself.In the case of any defamation suit LS would be asked to name the person who asked him to post that. If that person said it wasn't of his doing the "poster" would probably suffer the full weight of the law. Otherwise it would be too easy to spout crap and pass it off as some-one else's doing. Nick G is a legal man I think, I'm sure that he'll put us exactly straight on this later on. Here's some stuff on defamation by qallegation and impliance or innuendo. Allegations: How often do we read reports of `alleged' conduct? `The company chairman, Mr Jacobs, allegedly offered the Mayor a kick- back'. Journalists seem to think this protects them. But that is not the case. Reporting material as `allegations' by other people is not a protection because ordinary readers, listeners and viewers presume there is some factual basis to the `allegation'. Of course, it is different for crime and court stories. Reporting that a person has been charged with an offence (provided this is true) and reporting the `allegations' made in court, will not be seen as a statement that the accused committed the act. It is assumed everybody knows the law of the presumption of innocence. Also, as we will see later in the section on defamation, to rely on the defamation defence of fair and accurate report of court proceedings, it may be necessary to describe evidence as `allegations' until a verdict is reached. Inferences and innuendoes: Remember, the general public is capable of reading between the lines. The fact that you don't actually say `the Premier is corrupt' does not mean that a publication cannot have precisely that defamatory meaning if the audience could reasonably draw that inference from published informationthe Sir Humphrey Rule at work! Even if a defamatory meaning cannot be inferred from the publication itself, it may be conveyed because of background facts known to some people. For example, the statement: `Roberts visits 1 Smith Street' seems innocent enough in itself but would have the defamatory meaning that `Roberts visits prostitutes' to anyone who knows that 1 Smith Street is a brothel.

ESB you are not obviously a legal eagle, passing on incorrect information without a source quote is as good as saying it yourself.In the case of any defamation suit LS would be asked to name the person who asked him to post that. If that person said it wasn't of his doing the "poster" would probably suffer the full weight of the law. Otherwise it would be too easy to spout crap and pass it off as some-one else's doing. Nick G is a legal man I think, I'm sure that he'll put us exactly straight on this later on. Here's some stuff on defamation by qallegation and impliance or innuendo. Allegations: How often do we read reports of `alleged' conduct? `The company chairman, Mr Jacobs, allegedly offered the Mayor a kick- back'. Journalists seem to think this protects them. But that is not the case. Reporting material as `allegations' by other people is not a protection because ordinary readers, listeners and viewers presume there is some factual basis to the `allegation'. Of course, it is different for crime and court stories. Reporting that a person has been charged with an offence (provided this is true) and reporting the `allegations' made in court, will not be seen as a statement that the accused committed the act. It is assumed everybody knows the law of the presumption of innocence. Also, as we will see later in the section on defamation, to rely on the defamation defence of fair and accurate report of court proceedings, it may be necessary to describe evidence as `allegations' until a verdict is reached. Inferences and innuendoes: Remember, the general public is capable of reading between the lines. The fact that you don't actually say `the Premier is corrupt' does not mean that a publication cannot have precisely that defamatory meaning if the audience could reasonably draw that inference from published informationthe Sir Humphrey Rule at work! Even if a defamatory meaning cannot be inferred from the publication itself, it may be conveyed because of background facts known to some people. For example, the statement: `Roberts visits 1 Smith Street' seems innocent enough in itself but would have the defamatory meaning that `Roberts visits prostitutes' to anyone who knows that 1 Smith Street is a brothel.

4,622,470